Subject: news of the day 1/23/04 |
From: Rick Hasen |
Date: 1/23/2004, 8:11 AM |
To: election-law |
See this
A.P. report. The report itself, from Electionline.org, is available
here.
For an opinion piece saying yes, see here.
Before the Supreme Court decided the McConnell case, I questioned here the constitutionality of BCRA's section 311, the "stand by your ad" provision that requires a candidate to say on camera on a broadcast ad that he or she authorized the ad. In particular I questioned whether this provision by compelling speech by the candidate (as opposed to merely requiring disclosure of authorization or funding) was constitutional under the First Amendment, particularly because the purpose of the provision appeared to be to limit the amount of negative advertising, which I take to be an unconstitutional purpose.
In the McConnell case, the Court summarily upheld section
311
against constitutional challenge (it was part of Chief Justice
Rehnquist's holding for the Court). Here is the entire
analysis:
The McConnell and Chamber of Commerce plaintiffs challenge BCRA § 311 by simply noting that § 311, along with all of the "electioneering communications" provisions of BCRA, is unconstitutional. We disagree. We think BCRA § 311's inclusion of electioneering communications in the FECA § 318 disclosure regime bears a sufficient relationship to the important governmental interest of "shed [ding] the light of publicity" on campaign financing. Buckley, 424 U.S., at 81, 96 S.Ct. 612. Assuming as we must that FECA § 318 is valid to begin with, and that FECA § 318 is valid as amended by BCRA § 311's amendments other than the inclusion of electioneering communications, the challenged inclusion of electioneering communications is not itself unconstitutional. We affirm the District Court's decision upholding § 311's expansion of FECA § 318(a) to include disclosure of disbursements for electioneering communications.
Beth Garrett has posted Democracy
in the Wake of the California Recall on SSRN. It is part of the
upcoming election
law symposium at Penn Law School. Here is the abstract:
-- Rick Hasen Professor of Law and William M. Rains Fellow Loyola Law School 919 South Albany Street Los Angeles, CA 90015-1211 (213)736-1466 (213)380-3769 - fax rick.hasen@lls.edu http://www.lls.edu/academics/faculty/hasen.html http://electionlawblog.org