Subject: news of the day 4/29/04 |
From: Rick Hasen |
Date: 4/29/2004, 7:45 AM |
To: election-law |
The Oakland Tribune offers this
report. See also this
Los Angeles Times report.
The New York Times (I'm not sure why David Rosenbaum refers to Justice Scalia's opinion as the "controlling opinion") (and see this editorial); The Wall Street Journal (thanks to Steven Sholk for the pointer); The Los Angeles Times; The Washington Post; Chicago Sun-Times; Philalelphia Inquirer; Houston Chronicle.
In the blogosphere, Bob Bauer has posted his thoughts here
; Ed Still is here;
Marty Lederman is here.
I am much more skeptical than Marty that even state legislators who
feel duty bound to uphold the Constitution will have much problem
engaging in the most partisan of gerrymanders. It is not as though
Justice Kennedy's opinion gives much hope of anyone ever coming up with
a standard that would satisfy him, having rejected the standards in Bandemer,
the plaintiffs' standard, and the three proposed dissents' standards.
A.P. offers this
report. Thanks to David Ettinger for the pointer.
-- Rick Hasen Professor of Law and William M. Rains Fellow Loyola Law School 919 South Albany Street Los Angeles, CA 90015-1211 (213)736-1466 (213)380-3769 - fax rick.hasen@lls.edu http://www.lls.edu/academics/faculty/hasen.html http://electionlawblog.org