Subject: Re: Summary Affirmance in Cox
From: Rick Hasen
Date: 6/30/2004, 7:37 AM
To: Marty Lederman
CC: election-law <election-law@majordomo.lls.edu>, Tom Goldstein <tgoldstein@goldsteinhowe.com>

Thanks Marty, but I had predicted that the case would be set for argument.  See here
http://electionlawblog.org/archives/001421.html
(better than Tom Goldstein's prediction of a summary reversal!)
I'll have more analysis of the very interesting concurring and dissenting opinions later.
Rick

Marty Lederman wrote:
Rick's prognostication proved correct:   The Court summarily affirmed in Cox, with a concurring opinion by Justice Stevens (joined by Justice Breyer) and a dissenting opinion by Justice Scalia.

-- 
Rick Hasen
Professor of Law and William M. Rains Fellow
Loyola Law School
919 South Albany Street
Los Angeles, CA  90015-1211
(213)736-1466
(213)380-3769 - fax
rick.hasen@lls.edu
http://www.lls.edu/academics/faculty/hasen.html
http://electionlawblog.org