Subject: news of the day 9/20/04
From: Rick Hasen
Date: 9/20/2004, 9:28 AM
To: election-law@majordomo.lls.edu

"Early Voting Draws More Interest from Parties"

Roll Call offers this report.


Nader Vote Trading is Back

See this report. Is this a form of illegal vote buying? The issue is currently being litigated in California. Relying in part on my article, Vote Buying 88 California Law Review 1323 (2000), the ACLU is arguing before the district court that the reasons we generally think about for making vote buying illegal---that it is inegalitiarian, inefficient, or violates an inalienability norm---do not apply to vote trading between voters in different states. The ACLU further argues that vote trading on these websites is unenforceable, and therefore speech activity protected by the First Amendment under Brown v. Hartledge. Professor Jamie Raskin, quoted in the linked article, has been advocating such vote trading since 2000.


"Parties Direct Donors to States to Avoid Breaking Law"

See this report, which initially appeared in the New York Times.


McCain, Feingold, on Fixing the Presidential Public Financing System

Bloomberg offers this report.


Are 527 Ads Nastier?

See this report, originally from the Miami Herald.


Federal District Court Strikes Down Numerous BCRA Implementing Rules

In an opinion dated Saturday but more widely reported today, a federal district court struck down a number of Federal Election Commission rules implementing the McCain-Feingold (Bipartisan Campaign Reform Act/BCRA) law passed by Congress in 2002. I have not had a chance to review the lengthy opinion; Bob Bauer has posted some initial commentary here.

What impact will this ruling have on the rules for the upcoming election? It is not clear that it will have any impact. The judge remanded the case for additional proceedings at the FEC consistent with the opinion. I am not sure when the opinion becomes final, and whether there might be any stay sought of the ruling should the FEC decide to appeal the case to the D.C. Circuit.

I certainly hope that the rules that were in effect at the FEC will continue to be in effect for this election cycle. With just six weeks before the election, it would be chaos for some of the basic fundraising rules to be changed now.

UPDATE: See this A.P. report.
-- 
Professor Rick Hasen 
Loyola Law School 
919 South Albany Street 
Los Angeles, CA  90015-0019 
(213)736-1466 - voice 
(213)380-3769 - fax 
rick.hasen@lls.edu 
http://www.lls.edu/academics/faculty/hasen.html 
http://electionlawblog.org