Subject: more news |
From: Rick Hasen |
Date: 11/1/2004, 2:28 PM |
To: election-law |
See this
report by the Center for Public Integrity. From their press release:
Under Federal Election Commission rules, both candidates are allowed to use remaining funds from their primary election committees to conduct recount activities, which in Kerry's case amounts to just under $45 million. That compares to just more than $16 million left over in the Bush/Cheney primary election committee's coffers.
This one is brought by Republican challengers and the Ohio Attorney General to the Ohio Supreme Court. Petitioners seek an order directed to the Ohio Secretary of State to rescind existing rules about the number of challengers per voting location and to allow more challengers per location. The documents are here.
These final lawsuits, including the appeals to the Sixth Circuit in
separate litigation raising related questions, are surely taxing the
judiciary in Ohio to the limit. We could have even more confusion on
election day if either the Sixth Circuit or the Ohio Supreme Court
change the rules some time late this evening.
Tony Mauro writes this
fascinating article (registration required) in Legal Times
on a 1912 recently discovered (by Green Bag editor Ross Davies)
in-chambers opinion by two Justices stemming from an electoral college
dispute between supporters of Teddy Roosevelt and Howard Taft. A
snippet:
You
can access a five-page analysis, "How Conflicts Over Poll Challengers
and Provisional Ballots May Impact the 2004 Election" by Spencer
Overton on his web
page.
-- Professor Rick Hasen Loyola Law School 919 South Albany Street Los Angeles, CA 90015-0019 (213)736-1466 - voice (213)380-3769 - fax rick.hasen@lls.edu http://www.lls.edu/academics/faculty/hasen.html http://electionlawblog.org