Subject: news of the day 11/12/04 |
From: Rick Hasen |
Date: 11/12/2004, 7:58 AM |
To: election-law |
According to this
report
(with a poorly written headline), a second suit has been filed in
federal court: "plaintiffs in the federal lawsuit allege a scheme to
dilute votes that they contend should have gone to the top two
vote-getters – both Republicans – from the primary election."
So suggests this
article in the Boston Phoenix (see page 2). Thanks to Jeff
Hauser for the link.
See this
report. Here
is OSU's summary of the Ohio recount procedures.
A.P. offers this
report,
which begins: "The Eureka Times-Standard has filed a complaint with the
California Fair Political Practices Commission alleging that a
political group that produced campaign mailers and TV ads about a city
councilman should have to identify the people behind it."
The Philadelphia Inquirer offers this
report, with the following subhead: "Reports of voting problems
have fueled claims of fraud. Experts - and Kerry lawyers - disagree."
The Indianapolis Star offers this
report,
which begins: "Election equipment counted straight-party votes for
Democratic candidates as Libertarian votes, an error that could affect
election outcomes in as many as nine counties, the Richmond
Palladium-Item reported today." Thanks to Jeff Hauser for the link.
-- Rick Hasen Professor of Law and William M. Rains Fellow Loyola Law School 919 South Albany Street Los Angeles, CA 90015-1211 (213)736-1466 (213)380-3769 - fax rick.hasen@lls.edu http://www.lls.edu/academics/faculty/hasen.html http://electionlawblog.org