Subject: news of the day 11/19/04 |
From: Rick Hasen |
Date: 11/19/2004, 7:38 AM |
To: election-law |
A.P. offers this
report.
A.P. offers this
report.
A hearing on the "fill in the bubble" suit is set for Monday. See here.
The outcome will likely depend on this litigation. According to this
Los Angeles Times report, one expert opines: "Donna Frye
will not be the top vote-getter"..."The oval ballots are her last
chance."
Wisconsin political scientist Ken Mayer
writes:
Moreover, a more sophisticated analysis would look not at the county level, but at precincts, which give you many more independent variables and much more variation. Finally (although this introduces some ecological inference problems), the key is not the percentage of the vote, but the number of votes. And I'd be far more convinced if a similar analysis of the Senate vote failed to show the same sorts of movement (if it did, that would clearly indicate that the assumptions of the presidential analysis were off, or that the conspirators were so stupid that they'd risk cheating on two elections at the same time).
Finally, it always sets my spider sense atingling when a quantitative social science paper uses more significant digits in the results than you have in the underlying variables. You can't get 7 or 8 meaningful significant digits (table 3) when the original data only have 1 or 2 significant digits. That implies a level of precision that you just don't have.
A.P. offers this
report,
which begins: "he record use of electronic voting machines on Nov. 2
led to hundreds of voting irregularities and shows the need for higher
standards, a voting rights group said Thursday."
-- Rick Hasen Professor of Law and William M. Rains Fellow Loyola Law School 919 South Albany Street Los Angeles, CA 90015-1211 (213)736-1466 (213)380-3769 - fax rick.hasen@lls.edu http://www.lls.edu/academics/faculty/hasen.html http://electionlawblog.org