Subject: "Australian ballot" and "secret ballot" aren't synonyms
From: "ban@richardwinger.com" <richardwinger@yahoo.com>
Date: 1/12/2005, 10:07 AM
To: Tom Round <tround@scu.edu.au>, "Ewald, Alec " <ewalda@union.edu>
CC: election-law@majordomo.lls.edu
Reply-to:
ban@richardwinger.com

One can have a secret ballot even though it isn't a
government printed ballot.  Alternatively, one can
have a government-printed ballot that isn't a secret
ballot.  The terms shouldn't be used interchangeably.

The U.S. had party-printed ballots everywhere before
1888.  But it was still possible to have a secret
ballot before 1888.  Laws could mandate that all
party-printed ballots had to be of a certain color and
size, and so a voter who folded his ballot before he
approached the public polling place could still enjoy
a secret ballot.

And having a government-printed ballot didn't
necessarily guarantee a secret ballot, if the polling
place didn't have a curtained-off area for voters to
vote.

The idea of having a secret ballot, and the idea of
having a ballot printed by the government listing all
parties, were really two reforms which came in
simultaneously, for the most part.



		
__________________________________ 
Do you Yahoo!? 
All your favorites on one personal page – Try My Yahoo!
http://my.yahoo.com