Subject: news of the day 1/25/05 |
From: Rick Hasen |
Date: 1/25/2005, 8:31 AM |
To: election-law |
See here.
The San Francisco Chronicle offers this
report. Should Bill Jones replace him? See my earlier post.
BNA reports
(paid subscription required): "The Federal Election Commission lost a
required registration letter sent to the FEC last year by President
Bush's inaugural committee, pledging to officially disclose all of its
private donors and to forgo foreign donations, an FEC spokesman told
BNA Jan. 24."
A.P. offers this
report,
which begins: "The sons of a first-term congresswoman and Milwaukee's
former acting mayor were among five Democratic activists charged Monday
with slashing the tires of vans rented by Republicans to drive voters
and monitors to the polls on Election Day." See also this
column on Milwaukee's election administration controversies.
See this
report in the Arizona Republic,
which begins: "The U.S. Justice Department on Monday cleared the way
for counties across the state to carry out the voting provisions of
Proposition 200, the anti-illegal immigration measure approved by
Arizona voters in November....New voters would have to present proof of
citizenship with a birth certificate, passport or other identification
to register. All voters would have to show identification at the polls."
Bob Bauer comments here
on proposed
legislation in Congress to regulate more 527 organizations as
political committees.
Via Dan Weintraub, BoifromTroy and commenters are debating whether the California Constitution would allow Gov. Schwarzenegger to appoint Bill Jones to succeed Kevin Shelley if Shelley retires. Article V, Section 5(b) gives the Governor the power to appoint, subject to confirmation by both houses of the state legislature. Because Jones appears to be termed out (see Article V, Section 11 ["No ... Secretary of State... may serve in the same office for more than 2 terms."]), the answer may hinge on an exception to term limits contained in Article XX, Section 7 ("Those [term] limitations shall not apply to any unexpired term to which a person is elected or appointed if the remainder of the term is less than half of the full term.").
I don't know anything about the legislative history of this
provision, but it does appear to apply as a textual matter to the Jones
case. Perhaps a bigger obstacle is the appearance of a conflict of
interest: As reported in this
San Jose Mercury News article
from June 2004, shortly after leaving office Jones became a paid
consultant for Sequoia Voting Systems, and has lobbied local
governments to adopt Sequoia's electronic voting systems. It seems to
me any person to replace Shelley must be above even the appearance of a
conflict of interest---trust and nonpartisanship should be the key
toward restoring public faith in California's process.
Erik S. Jaffe has written McConnell
v. FEC: Rationing Speech to Prevent "Undue" Influence in the
2003-2004 Cato Supreme Court Review.
For my research on election administration reform, I've just been
going through Election
Reform: Politics and Policy (Palazzolo and Ceaser, eds. 2005). Here
is the description:
List of Contributors
Bruce Cain, James W. Ceaser, Doug Chapin,
Joshua Dyck, James Gimpel, Mathew Gunning, David Kimball, Martha Kropf,
Glen Krutz, R. Doug Lewis, Sarah Liebschutz, Todd Lochner, Karin
MacDonald, Susan A. MacManus, Jerome Maddox, Daniel J. Palazzolo,
Robert Montjoy, Gary Moncrief, Elizabeth Peiffer, Randall Strahan, John
T. Whelan
-- Professor Rick Hasen Loyola Law School 919 Albany Street Los Angeles, CA 90015-1211 (213)736-1466 - voice (213)380-3769 - fax rick.hasen@lls.edu http://www.lls.edu/academics/faculty/hasen.html http://electionlawblog.org