Subject: news of the day 3/17/05 |
From: Rick Hasen |
Date: 3/17/2005, 9:54 AM |
To: election-law |
Citing to news reports over a recent ruling in Illinois, Howard
Bashman asks: If
candidates for elective state appellate court judgeships can't rule on
cases involving campaign donors, then who would be willing to donate to
such campaigns?
Via Political
Wire, see this
Newsday report where a surprise write-in candiadate beat an
incumbent mayor running unopposed.
The Seattle Times offers this
report,
which begins: "The list of alleged felon voters compiled in Dino
Rossi's legal challenge to the governor's election mistakenly includes
people tried as juveniles who never lost their right to vote."
So suggests Stuart Rothenberg in this
Roll Call column (paid subscription required).
The Los Angeles Daily News offers this
report,
which begins: "The California Secretary of State's Office announced
Wednesday that it will investigate why City Clerk Frank Martinez
changed the software on the voting system used in Los Angeles' mayoral
primary without state approval -- one of several steps he took that
slowed the count and raised questions about the integrity of the
process." I have written some thoughts on the problems with the L.A.
election that I hope will appear soon.
The Asbury Park Press offers this
report,
which begins: "More than half of New Jersey's registered voters believe
Democratic U.S. Sen. Jon S. Corzine's ability to finance his own
gubernatorial race is an asset allowing for his independence, not the
liability that Republicans suggest."
See here.
This issue is sure to heat up among conservative bloggers. The
editorial refers to a written response by Pew sent to the newspaper. If
anyone has a copy of that letter, I'll link to it or post it.
This
LA Times article
suggests confirmation of Bruce McPherson to replace Secretary of State
Kevin Shelley is very likely, but there are already questions being
raised about whether McPherson's transition team is too partisan. The
article also notes that California is considering legislation that
"would prohibit the secretary of state and any candidates for the
office from endorsing or opposing any candidates or ballot measures. SB
11 would also prohibit voting equipment manufacturers or vendors from
donating to candidates for public office."
Bob Bauer has put up this
very thoughtful post
that continues a debate of sorts between the two of us on this issue. I
hope to have time in the next few days to post a reply.
Don't miss Bush v.
Gore on Justice Antonin Scalia's Mind.
-- Professor Rick Hasen Loyola Law School 919 Albany Street Los Angeles, CA 90015-1211 (213)736-1466 - voice (213)380-3769 - fax rick.hasen@lls.edu http://www.lls.edu/academics/faculty/hasen.html http://electionlawblog.org