Subject: news of the day 8/16/05 |
From: Rick Hasen |
Date: 8/16/2005, 7:21 AM |
To: election-law |
Via Rough & Tumble, the following articles and commentaries on the special election and Proposition 77 appeared today:
Gov., Lawmakers Still Miles Apart on Ballot Measures (LA Times)
New districts possible for June 2006 vote If Prop. 77 passes, secretary of state sees quick implementation (SF Chronicle, noting that this was "an abrupt shift of direction" for McPherson) -- in somewhat related news, the Sacramento Bee offers McPherson might run: Details later
Daniel
Weintraub: Now the real debate over Proposition 77 can begin (Sacramento
Bee) --- I agree with Weintraub that the Prop. 77 issue before the
California Supreme Court was a "close one," though I don't think he's
right that "Historically, the courts have given wide latitude to the
initiative process, letting a wide range of mishaps go as long as
sponsors have 'substantially complied' with the law." I'll be writing
more about this soon.
Over at Town Hall, Jack Kemp writes The
Voting Rights Act Turns 40. A snippet:
-- Rick Hasen William H. Hannon Distinguished Professor of Law Loyola Law School 919 Albany Street Los Angeles, CA 90015-1211 (213)736-1466 (213)380-3769 - fax rick.hasen@lls.edu http://www.lls.edu/academics/faculty/hasen.html http://electionlawblog.org