Subject: Electionlawblog news and commentary 10/24/05 |
From: Rick Hasen |
Date: 10/24/2005, 8:26 AM |
To: election-law |
This five-page survey has been posted by Electionline.org, the Caltech/MIT Voting Technology Project (VTP) and the University of Utah Center for Public Policy and Administration. It seeks to identify and assess a wide range of potential threats to the electoral process. More information on the survey here.
The Los Angeles Times offers this
report, which begins: "They have no official position on
California's proposed redistricting initiative, but county election
chiefs across the state dread the prospect of voters passing
Proposition 77."
This
commentary appeared in the Chicago Defender.
Law.com has posted this
oped by David Ettinger on an aspect of proposed California
Proposition 73 (parental notification for abortion) (paid subscription
required). A snippet of interest to election law:
It is not difficult to see the mischief that these annual reports could cause. Advocacy groups on either side of the abortion debate could (mis)use a judge or justice's scorecard during contested superior court elections, appellate court retention elections, or even judicial recall elections. It is not far-fetched to imagine a campaign flier proclaiming that Judge X or Justice Y "ordered the killing of 10 unborn children last year," a statement, incidentally, that would not be far from legal accuracy since another thing Prop 73 would do is define "abortion" as "caus[ing] the death of the unborn child."
Jerry Berman and Adam Bonin have written these
letters to the editor appearing in the Washington Post.
-- Rick Hasen William H. Hannon Distinguished Professor of Law Loyola Law School 919 Albany Street Los Angeles, CA 90015-1211 (213)736-1466 - voice (213)380-3769 - fax rick.hasen@lls.edu http://www.lls.edu/academics/faculty/hasen.html http://electionlawblog.org