Subject: Electionlawblog news and commentary 12/15/05 |
From: Rick Hasen |
Date: 12/15/2005, 7:53 AM |
To: election-law |
In my LA
Times oped from earlier this week, I urged the Ninth Circuit to
reconsider its opinion in Padilla v. Lever, or at least
indicate that the ruling does not extend to recall and initiative
petitions filed at the time of the court's decision. Orange County has
now filed a petition for rehearing en banc (I have the file, but it is
too large to post), and Real Parties in Interest have filed a motion to
petition for rehearing as well, making some very interesting arguments
in their proposed petition about the Zaldivar case relied upon
by the panel in Padilla. You can find that proposed petition here.
The Miami Herald offers this
report, with the subhead: "A top election official and computer
experts say computer hackers could easily change election results,
after they found numerous flaws with a state-approved voting-machine in
Tallahassee." A snippet:
Thompson couldn't hack into the system from the outside. So Sancho gave him access to the central machine that tabulates votes and to the last school election at Leon County High.
Thompson told The Herald he was ''shocked'' at how easy it was to get in, make the loser the winner and leave without a trace. The machine asked for a user name and password, but didn't require it, he said. That meant it had not just a ''front door, but a back door as big as a garage,'' Thompson said.
From there, Thompson said, he typed five lines of computer code -- and switched 5,000 votes from one candidate to another.
''I am positive an eighth grader could do this,'' Thompson said.
Linda Campbell offers this column
in the Fort Worth Star-Telegram on the Texas redistricting
cases. See also this
Houston Chronicle editorial.
A.P. offers this
report from Ohio, which begins: "COLUMBUS - Republicans in the Ohio
House and Senate tried to meet halfway on a bill that would
dramatically change the state's elections laws, couldn't do it, then
went home for the holidays. That was fine with the Democrats, who liken
the changes to an attack on voting rights. The House on Wednesday
rejected Senate amendments to a bill that would make major changes to
Ohio election law after concerns were raised about the effect on local
elections and other issues."
Tom Goldstein has this
post on SCOTUSBlog.
The Brennan Center has posted this
press release, which begins: "A new analysis
conducted by the Brennan Center for Justice at NYU School of Law and
Dr. Michael McDonald, an elections expert at George Mason University,
found factual and methodological errors in a recent voter fraud report
submitted to the state Attorney General in September. The report
claimed to have uncovered deep problems of voter fraud in New Jersey.
In its continuing effort to scrutinize the accuracy of claims of voter
fraud, the Brennan Center enlisted Dr. McDonald’s assistance in
analyzing the report’s underlying data. The analysts found serious
methodological problems with the report, echoing the problems with the
notoriously flawed 'suspected felon' purge lists in Florida in 2000 and
2004. They cautioned election officials not to rely on the flawed
report and urged the Attorney General to follow the normal statutory
procedures for maintaining the state’s voter registration rolls."
The Press Enterprise (Riverside, CA) offers this
report.
-- Rick Hasen William H. Hannon Distinguished Professor of Law Loyola Law School 919 Albany Street Los Angeles, CA 90015-1211 (213)736-1466 (213)380-3769 - fax rick.hasen@lls.edu http://www.lls.edu/academics/faculty/hasen.html http://electionlawblog.org