Subject: Electionlawblog news and commentary 12/20/05 |
From: Rick Hasen |
Date: 12/20/2005, 9:13 AM |
To: election-law |
The Sacramento Bee offers this
report.
The New Editor has this
post on Texas redistricting.
From yesterday's press
conference:
THE PRESIDENT: Yes, thanks. April, the fact that some in America believe that I am not concerned about race troubles me. One of the jobs of the President is to help people reconcile and to move forward and to unite. One of the most hurtful things I can hear is, Bush doesn't care about African Americans, for example. First of all, it's not true. And, secondly, I believe that -- obviously I've got to do a better job of communicating, I guess, to certain folks, because my job is to say to people, we're all equally American, and the American opportunity applies to you just as much as somebody else. And so I will continue to do my best, April, to reach out.
Now, you talked about -- and we have an opportunity, by the way, in New Orleans, for example, to make sure the education system works, to make sure that we promote ownership. I think it is vitally important for ownership to extend to more than just a single community. I think the more African Americans own their own business, the better off America is. I feel strongly that if we can get people to own and manage their own retirement accounts, like personal accounts and Social Security, it makes society a better place. I want people to be able to say, this is my asset. Heretofore, kind of asset accumulation may have been only a part of -- a single -- a part of -- a segmented part of our strategy. We want assets being passed from one generation to the next. I take pride in this statistic, that more African Americans own a home or more minorities own a home now than ever before in our nation's history, not just African Americans; that's positive.
I still want to make sure, though, that people understand that I care about them and that my view of the future, a bright future, pertains to them as much as any other neighborhood.
Now, you mentioned it's the Voting Rights Act. Congress needs to reauthorize it and I'll sign it.
The Shreveport Times offers this
report.
A.P. offers this
report. It quotes one of the attorneys as saying: "'The more the
ballots are handled, the more risk there is of human error." This was
quite a contentious claim in the Florida 2000 election controversy
culminating in Bush v. Gore.
The Campaign Legal Center has issued a press release,
on the new FEC nominations. A relevant part:
Rosemead has put its recall election back on track, after
postpoining it in reliance on the Ninth Circuit's Padilla v. Lever
case. See this
report, which indicates that DOJ has sent a letter saying it won't
raise Voting Rights Act objections. For background, see here.
ACORN has put out this
press release, which begins: "Today, ACORN (Association of
Community Organizations for Reform Now) announced that the last of
three politically-motivated lawsuits filed against the group in the
wake of its successful 2004 voter outreach drive has been 'dismissed
with prejudice.' Each of the three cases (two in Florida and one in
Ohio) were brought by partisan law firms based on unfounded allegations
of 'voter fraud' against the organization -- and all three cases have
been dismissed."
-- Rick Hasen William H. Hannon Distinguished Professor of Law Loyola Law School 919 Albany Street Los Angeles, CA 90015-1211 (213)736-1466 - voice (213)380-3769 - fax rick.hasen@lls.edu http://www.lls.edu/academics/faculty/hasen.html http://electionlawblog.org