Subject: Electionlawblog news and commentary 2/17/06 |
From: Rick Hasen |
Date: 2/17/2006, 7:56 AM |
To: election-law |
The Sacramento Bee offers this
report. A snippet:
"he message is, you might as well go to the Supreme Court each time you think there's a problem with an initiative,"Olson said.
"They obviously made the decision back before the election to put it on the ballot, and they had to justify that,"he said.
The Times-Picayune offers this
report, which begins: "New Orleans voters who were scattered
throughout the state and nation by Hurricanes Katrina and Rita should
be allowed to cast early votes in the April 22 city elections at 10
satellite voting centers in the state's largest parishes, the Senate
said Thursday."
See this
press release.
The Washington Post offers this
report on the ongoing election reform controversies in Maryland.
Here
is the district court opinion and order in the Chicago Heights voting
rights case that I mentioned
earlier this week. Thanks to Mathias Delort for the file.
Bob Bauer responds
to my post
yesterday on his attempt to get the FEC to create a broad exemption
from BCRA's electioneering communications rules for "genuine issue
advocacy." He concludes with a call that I engage in further debate on
the issue. I'll so so some time next week, when I am back in town.
-- Rick Hasen William H. Hannon Distinguished Professor of Law Loyola Law School 919 Albany Street Los Angeles, CA 90015-1211 (213)736-1466 (213)380-3769 - fax rick.hasen@lls.edu http://www.lls.edu/academics/faculty/hasen.html http://electionlawblog.org