Subject: Electionlawblog news and commentary 3/17/06 |
From: Rick Hasen |
Date: 3/17/2006, 9:43 AM |
To: election-law |
See this
press release, which begins: "Congressman David Dreier (R-San
Dimas,CA), Chairman of the House Rules Committee, today introduced H.R.
4975, the Lobbying Accountability and Transparency Act of 2006,
legislation to reform the lobbying and ethics rules of the House of
Representatives. Among the original co-sponsors of the bill are Speaker
of the House J. Dennis Hastert (R-IL), Majority Leader John Boehner
(R-OH), other members of the GOP elected leadership and several
committee chairmen. The legislation is expected to be referred to the
Committees on the Judiciary, Government Reform, Rules, Ethics, and
House Administration. Dreier said he looks forward to the bill moving
through the committee process, allowing members on both sides of the
aisle to debate and amend it." The bill itself will be posted here.
Here
is a section by section summary, which shows that 527 reform is
included in Rep. Dreier's measure.
BNA Money and Politics Report offers this report
(paid subscription required), which begins: "Federal Election
Commission Chairman Michael Toner reiterated March 16 that the FEC will
consider at its next open meeting March 23 a revised rule dealing with
Internet political communications. Toner made the statement at an FEC
meeting after House Republican leaders announced late March 15 that
they were pulling a bill (H.R. 1606) on the same subject from the
agenda for congressional debate. The development appeared to increase
the likelihood that the FEC would have to revise its regulations
implementing the Bipartisan Campaign Reform Act, in line with court
rulings, to remove a regulatory exemption for Internet political
messages." Still no word on what the content of that final rule may be.
Texas. Rep. Marc Veasey offers this oped
in the Fort Worth Star Telegram. It begins: "Recently, the U.S.
Supreme Court heard arguments in the Texas mid-decade redistricting
case. Tom DeLay might have stolen our political power in southeast Fort
Worth, but I refuse to let him silence us. In an effort to educate the
media, federal legislators and Supreme Court justices on the damage
done to the voting strength of southeast Fort Worth African-American
voters, I traveled to Washington to tell our story."
See here.
The Riverside Press Enterprise offers this
report, which begins: "The California Democratic Party called on
the state attorney general Thursday to investigate suspected
voter-registration fraud cases in at least two counties, including more
than 3,600 instances by one company in San Bernardino County.
Meanwhile, the same signature-gathering company, John Burkett Petition
Management, turned in 600 signatures Wednesday in Riverside County.
Officials found problems with at least a third of the
voter-registration cards, which were missing required driver-license or
state-identification numbers, said Rebecca Martine, Riverside County's
chief deputy registrar."
The New York Times offers this
report, which begins: "NEW ORLEANS, March 15 -- For decades, when
it came time to visit your friendly New Orleans property assessor with
a complaint, the outcome was likely to be mutually beneficial. The
assessor gave you a break on your taxes; you gave the assessor your
vote in the next election. No use righteously demurring; the deal has
been offered to generations of homeowners, always with a wink and nod.
With seven elected assessors handy -- far more than in most other
cities --- it has been a near-perfect system, except for the estimated
$80 million in lost revenue annually to a hard-up New Orleans. This
flaw, no longer considered folkloric in an age of diminished population
and empty city coffers, has now sparked an ultimate gesture of
political disgust. Seven challengers are running against the incumbent
assessors in next month's municipal election and are pledging to quit
as soon as they are elected. They are the newest political sensation
here: the 'I.Q. ticket,' meaning 'I Quit.'"
This
conference will take place at Princeton University on April 6 and
7. The link will take you to the agenda of the event, which includes
some terrific speakers. Here is the description:
John Morris of CDT has posted this
response on the Kos website regarding the choice between, among
other options, HR 1606 and HR 4900 (the CDT alternative). A snippet:
Seth Tillman has posted Model
Continuity of Congress Statute on SSRN. The abstract:
I note one defect in the model act in a footnote. If anyone could suggest a solution, I would be very grateful.
C.E. Petit has posted the
Intentional Fallacy on his Scrivener's Error blog. It discusses my
draft article, Bad
Legislative Intent.
-- Rick Hasen William H. Hannon Distinguished Professor of Law Loyola Law School 919 Albany Street Los Angeles, CA 90015-1211 (213)736-1466 (213)380-3769 - fax rick.hasen@lls.edu http://www.lls.edu/academics/faculty/hasen.html http://electionlawblog.org