Subject: Re: Electionlawblog 3/21/06-- Puerto Rico
From: "Hugh L. Brady" <brady@bradylawyer.com>
Date: 3/22/2006, 8:39 PM
CC: election-law@majordomo.lls.edu

<x-flowed>Do you have a copy of the Congressional legal counsel's opinion that could be shared with the list?

-- 
Hugh L. Brady
Attorney & Counselor at Law
Austin, Texas  | Burlington, Vermont
(512) 275-3600 | (802) 863-1188 Telephone
(512) 233-0970 | (802) 813-1011 Telecopier

PLEASE NOTE: This message was created by a lawyer and may be confidential and privileged. If you are not the intended recipient, kindly delete the message. I would also appreciate a return e-mail letting me know the message went astray. My practice in Vermont is limited exclusively to consultations with licensed lawyers. Thank you.

ALSO PLEASE NOTE: Notwithstanding United States law (including the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act of 1978), this e-mail message, without warrant or warning, may be subject to monitoring by the United States National Security Agency and/or the Department of Defense. Information contained in this message may be used against any senders or recipients, now or in the future, in a public trial or secret tribunal.


ban@richardwinger.com wrote:

The legal arm of Congress wrote an opinion last year
that Congress does have the authority to give D.C. a
voting representative.  The opinion was prepared for a
Republican Congressman Virginia, Tom Davis.  The
author was a very distinguished law professor. Congressman Davis has a bill giving D.C. a voting
member in the US House, and also enlarging the size of
the House so that Utah would also get a new seat. Since everyone presumes DC would elect a Democrat, and
Utah would elect a Republican, Congressman Davis felt
this was politically feasible.  However, his bill
hasn't advanced, as far as I know.
 


</x-flowed>