Due to an
HTML error, I did not properly link to Dan Tokaji's analysis of the RFK
article. Here it my corrected post. Or, click directly on Dan's
analysis:
http://moritzlaw.osu.edu/blogs/tokaji/2006/06/back-to-ohio-rolling-stone-piece.html
Tokaji Answers the Call
Dan Tokaji, whose views on this I respect more than anyone else, has
written this
must-read analysis of RFK Jr's Rolling Stone article
claiming that the 2004 presidential election was stolen in Ohio. A
snippet:
Kennedy's treatment of his subject differs from most "stolen
election" arguments we've heard since 2004, in that it's much more
comprehensively researched -- including over 200 footnotes that would
make a law professor proud. While there's not a whole lot of new
information here, Kennedy does a nice job of explaining and cataloguing
the numerous problems that did in fact occur in Ohio's 2004 election.
For reasons explained below, I don't think he makes a persuasive case
that the election was "stolen" (i.e., that Kerry really won). The
article is nevertheless useful in exposing how shoddy election
administration practices can result in lost votes, and how some
recently enacted laws will make things worse rather than better.
Read Dan's thorough analysis.
Posted by Rick Hasen at
07:54 PM
Read Dan's thorough analysis.
--
Rick Hasen
William H. Hannon Distinguished Professor of Law
Loyola Law School
919 Albany Street
Los Angeles, CA 90015-1211
(213)736-1466
(213)380-3769 - fax
rick.hasen@lls.edu
http://www.lls.edu/academics/faculty/hasen.html
http://electionlawblog.org