And as long as we're going down that road, should we apply the same
logic to sponsored debates that exclude candidates on the ballot? The
presidential 'debates' every four years are rigged to benefit the majors
to the detriment of all other candidates.
-----Original Message-----
From: owner-election-law_gl@majordomo.lls.edu
[mailto:owner-election-law_gl@majordomo.lls.edu] On Behalf Of Volokh,
Eugene
Sent: Thursday, 08 June, 2006 2:40 PM
To: election-law@majordomo.lls.edu
Subject: RE: Query: Rules Governing TV Surveys
How is this a campaign contribution rather than an independent
expenditure, unless the poll was coordinated with one of the campaigns
(unlikely, given that the initial inquiry said the poll was conducted by
a local TV station)?
I have to say that it seems pretty outrageous to me that the law
could ban "unfair" polls, or decide which candidates are "quality" and
must be included and which are not "quality" and may be excluded; that
seems like a quintessential judgment call for speakers to make. That's
even so given the looser standards applicable to broadcasters, it seems
to me.
Eugene
-----Original Message-----
From: owner-election-law_gl@majordomo.lls.edu
[mailto:owner-election-law_gl@majordomo.lls.edu] On Behalf Of
richard@shepardlawoffice.com
Sent: Thursday, June 08, 2006 10:10 AM
To: rkgaddie@ou.edu; election-law@majordomo.lls.edu
Subject: RE: Query: Rules Governing TV Surveys
I think the poll may represent an over limit campaign
contribution to candidates "a" and "b", particularly if the
TV station broadcasts the results as a verity.
Richard Shepard, Attorney at Law
Shepard Law Office, Inc.
818 S. Yakima Ave., #200
Tacoma, WA 98405
253-383-2235
-----Original Message-----
From: owner-election-law_gl@majordomo.lls.edu
[mailto:owner-election-law_gl@majordomo.lls.edu]On Behalf Of
rkgaddie@ou.edu
Sent: Thursday, June 08, 2006 5:18 AM
To: election-law@majordomo.lls.edu
Subject: Query: Rules Governing TV Surveys
I had an inquiry from a political campaign regarding the
rules governing the conduct of surveys and the broadcast of
results. One of our local television affiliates contracted
SurveyUSA to perform a poll of potential voters for a primary
in an open congressional seat. There are six candidates for
the seat, including five "quality" candidates. However,
SUSA, in conducting the robocall survey, presented
respondents with three options:
(1) candidate "a"
(2) candidate "b"
(3) "others".
79% of respondents picked either "1" or "2". Now, the
problem is that internal polling for multiple campaigns
(using better pollsters tha SUSA) show a much tighter race
and a more even spread of the vote. One candidate has lawyer
telling her/him that this poll, by not presenting all
legitimate alternatives and then being broadcast, constitutes
a legal violation by the station. Bad polls are not illegal,
and this is a bad poll, but is there a legal issue here?
_____________________________
Ronald Keith Gaddie
Professor of Political Science
The University of Oklahoma
455 West Lindsey Street, Room 222
Norman, OK 73019-2001
Phone 405-325-4989
Fax 405-325-0718
E-mail: rkgaddie@ou.edu
http://faculty-staff.ou.edu/G/Ronald.K.Gaddie-1
The information contained in this communication is intended for the use of the designated recipients named above. If the reader of this communication is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that you have received this communication in error, and that any review, dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify The Associated Press immediately by telephone at +1-212-621-1898 and delete this email. Thank you.