Subject: RE: Query: Rules Governing TV Surveys
From: "Volokh, Eugene" <VOLOKH@law.ucla.edu>
Date: 6/8/2006, 11:40 AM
To: election-law@majordomo.lls.edu

	How is this a campaign contribution rather than an independent
expenditure, unless the poll was coordinated with one of the campaigns
(unlikely, given that the initial inquiry said the poll was conducted by
a local TV station)?

	I have to say that it seems pretty outrageous to me that the law
could ban "unfair" polls, or decide which candidates are "quality" and
must be included and which are not "quality" and may be excluded; that
seems like a quintessential judgment call for speakers to make.  That's
even so given the looser standards applicable to broadcasters, it seems
to me.

	Eugene

-----Original Message-----
From: owner-election-law_gl@majordomo.lls.edu 
[mailto:owner-election-law_gl@majordomo.lls.edu] On Behalf Of 
richard@shepardlawoffice.com
Sent: Thursday, June 08, 2006 10:10 AM
To: rkgaddie@ou.edu; election-law@majordomo.lls.edu
Subject: RE: Query: Rules Governing TV Surveys


I think the poll may represent an over limit campaign 
contribution to candidates "a" and "b", particularly if the 
TV station broadcasts the results as a verity.

Richard Shepard, Attorney at Law
Shepard Law Office, Inc.
818 S. Yakima Ave., #200
Tacoma, WA 98405
253-383-2235

-----Original Message-----
From: owner-election-law_gl@majordomo.lls.edu
[mailto:owner-election-law_gl@majordomo.lls.edu]On Behalf Of 
rkgaddie@ou.edu
Sent: Thursday, June 08, 2006 5:18 AM
To: election-law@majordomo.lls.edu
Subject: Query: Rules Governing TV Surveys

I had an inquiry from a political campaign regarding the 
rules governing the conduct of surveys and the broadcast of 
results.  One of our local television affiliates contracted 
SurveyUSA to perform a poll of potential voters for a primary 
in an open congressional seat. There are six candidates for 
the seat, including five "quality" candidates.  However, 
SUSA, in conducting the robocall survey, presented 
respondents with three options:

(1) candidate "a"
(2) candidate "b"
(3) "others".

79% of respondents picked either "1" or "2".  Now, the 
problem is that internal polling for multiple campaigns 
(using better pollsters tha SUSA) show a much tighter race 
and a more even spread of the vote.  One candidate has lawyer 
telling her/him that this poll, by not presenting all 
legitimate alternatives and then being broadcast, constitutes 
a legal violation by the station.  Bad polls are not illegal, 
and this is a bad poll, but is there a legal issue here?

_____________________________
Ronald Keith Gaddie
Professor of Political Science
The University of Oklahoma
455 West Lindsey Street, Room 222
Norman, OK  73019-2001
Phone 405-325-4989
Fax 405-325-0718
E-mail: rkgaddie@ou.edu 
http://faculty-staff.ou.edu/G/Ronald.K.Gaddie-1