Subject: Electionlawblog news and commentary 6/9/06 |
From: Rick Hasen |
Date: 6/9/2006, 7:39 AM |
To: election-law |
The SF Chronicle offers this
report. A snippet:
Sequoia Voting Systems Inc. of Oakland will provide 1,000 optical scanners and 1,000 touch-screen voting computers for each of the county's 830 polling places at a cost of $13.5 million.
Having been burned by faulty e-voting systems before, supervisors added a caveat to the contract: The new machines must first pass a professional hacker test before the Alameda County Registrar of Voters office accepts delivery. If they fail, Sequoia must pay for any fixes.
If all goes well, voters in November can expect to fill in bubbles on paper ballots, and those ballots will be hand-fed through Sequoia's scanners and recorded in a central database. Each polling site also will have at least one touch-screen voting computer for the disabled -- or anyone else wishing to use them. Those machines will produce a printout on a paper roll that is saved inside the computer.
The Washington Post offers this
editorial. Bob Bauer comments.
Allison Hayward has posted this
interesting list of grant recipients (and the amounts of the
grants) from Carnegie related to "strengthening U.S. democracy."
This
partisan bickering is even more reason to move to nonpartisan
election administration.
Verified Voting has issued this
press release and summary.
See this testimony from the U.S. Election Assistance Commission before the House Administration Committee. The GAO has also released this 500+ page report, "The Nation's Evolving Election System as Reflected in the November 2004 General Election." Thanks to Bobbie Brinegar for the links.
Meanwhile, Dan Tokaji posts Soaries
Speaks -- And Boy Does He Ever!", about an interview
the former head of the EAC gave to Rolling Stone.
Laughlin McDonald has written this
column for Findlaw, responding to my column
on the same subject last week. Laughlin's arguments are based on a
readings of the fact and the law that I find hard to believe the
current Supreme Court majority is going to accept (as much as I would
want them to). If you want a detailed analysis of why I am concerned,
and why I have suggested
some
steps to improve the VRA's chances of survival, see my OSU Law
Journal article on the topic.
-- Rick Hasen William H. Hannon Distinguished Professor of Law Loyola Law School 919 Albany Street Los Angeles, CA 90015-1211 (213)736-1466 (213)380-3769 - fax rick.hasen@lls.edu http://www.lls.edu/academics/faculty/hasen.html http://electionlawblog.org