Subject: Re: Mehlman pushes storyline that Democrats commit vote fraud
From: Rick Hasen
Date: 6/10/2006, 11:04 AM
To: Michael McDonald
CC: election-law@majordomo.lls.edu

It is worth pointing out that some on the left too are looking to use the Bilbray-Busby race as proof of fraud (or potential fraud) in the electoral process:

http://www.bradblog.com/archives/00002924.htm

This pattern of partisans trying to raise questions about the fairness of the electoral process is something I expect to continue until we see more moves toward creating more nonpartisan professionalized election administration systems.  It is especially troubling in this instance because local election administration in California has, at least until recently, had a very good reputation for nonpartisanship and professionalization. 

Rick

Michael McDonald wrote:
I thought this would be of interest:

In the wake of the Busby defeat in California's 50th district, Republican
chair Ken Mehlman pushed the storyline on Hardball that Busby encouraged
illegal immigrants to vote in the special election, and tied the claim to
Democrat Gregoire's victory in the Washington recount case.

For a transcript see: http://mediamatters.org/items/200606090002 (for the
conservatives on the list, my apologies for linking to a left-leaning web
site.)

A few points here:

1. A fair reading of Busby's controversial comment that "you don't need
papers to vote" is that she mispoke and corrected herself in the next
sentence to say that you don't have to be a citizen to volunteer for a
campaign.  From my vantage of teaching a campaigns class in Washington DC at
a school with many foreign nationals, I have known non-citizen students who
worked on Democratic and Republican campaigns.  I'll be curious to hear the
opinion of those on the list if the campaign activity represents an illegal
political donation from a foreign national.  Was Busby promoting illegal
activity?

2. To my knowledge, there is no evidence that any fradulent votes were cast
in the California special election.  There is, to my knowledge, no
investigation underway to determine if Busby's campaign orchestrated the
casting of fradulent votes.  Perhaps someone knows something different?

3. With regards to the Washinton recount case, there were inleigible felons
and a husband of a deceased women who testified that their illegal votes
went to Rossi, the Republican candidate.  There is no evidence that
Gregoire's campaign knowlingly solicited illegal votes.

I'm sure we can all see where this is leading: we need photo identification
at the polls to prevent Democrats from stealing elections using illegal
immigrants.  I'm sure that we're going to hear more of this as the election
approaches.  Chris Matthews can be expected to promote this kind of
rhetoric, but I am disappointed that Charile Cook (the third guest on the
show, and typical of the cable talk shows, he was apparently there to
provide "balance" to Mehlman) didn't interject a more reasoned response.

------------
Dr. Michael P. McDonald 
Assistant Professor, George Mason University 
Visiting Fellow, Brookings Institution

                          Mailing address: 
(o) 703-993-4191          George Mason University 
(f) 703-993-1399          Dept. of Public and International Affairs
mmcdon@gmu.edu            4400 University Drive - 3F4 
http://elections.gmu.edu  Fairfax, VA 22030-4444





  

-- 
Rick Hasen
William H. Hannon Distinguished Professor of Law
Loyola Law School
919 Albany Street
Los Angeles, CA  90015-1211
(213)736-1466
(213)380-3769 - fax
rick.hasen@lls.edu
http://www.lls.edu/academics/faculty/hasen.html
http://electionlawblog.org