Subject: LULAC v. Perry and the Texas Constitution |
From: "David Schultz" <dschultz@gw.hamline.edu> |
Date: 7/5/2006, 1:03 PM |
To: election-law@majordomo.lls.edu |
Early on the plaintiffs in the Texas case argued that the midterm redistricting violated the TX constitution. Of course the Supremes could not address this issue. DId I miss something or was the Texas con law claim never addressed in a state court? David Schultz, Professor Hamline University Graduate School of Management 570 Asbury Street Suite 305 St. Paul, Minnesota 55104 651.523.2858 (voice) 651.523.3098 (fax) http://davidschultz.efoliomn2.com