Subject: Re: LULAC v. Perry and the Texas Constitution
From: "David Schultz" <dschultz@gw.hamline.edu>
Date: 7/6/2006, 11:13 AM
To: JMWice@aol.com, "election-law" <election-law@majordomo.lls.edu>, owner-election-law_gl@majordomo.lls.edu

Jeff:

Do you have cites on the GA case?

David Schultz, Professor
Hamline University
Graduate School of  Management
570 Asbury Street
Suite 305
St. Paul, Minnesota 55104
651.523.2858 (voice)
651.523.3098 (fax)
http://davidschultz.efoliomn2.com


<JMWice@aol.com> 7/5/2006 4:45 PM >>>

On a similar note, Georgia plaintiffs are appealing a state trial
court ruling on mid-decade state senate redistricting to the GA
Supreme Court, arguing that the state constitution bars such action.

Jeff Wice
  

-----Original Message-----
From: "David Schultz" <dschultz@gw.hamline.edu>
Date: Wed, 05 Jul 2006 15:03:11 
To:<election-law@majordomo.lls.edu>
Subject: LULAC v. Perry and the Texas Constitution

Early on the plaintiffs in the Texas case argued that the midterm
redistricting violated the TX constitution. Of course the Supremes
could not address this issue.  DId I miss something or was the Texas
con law claim never addressed in a state court?


David Schultz, Professor
Hamline University
Graduate School of  Management
570 Asbury Street
Suite 305
St. Paul, Minnesota 55104
651.523.2858 (voice)
651.523.3098 (fax)
http://davidschultz.efoliomn2.com