Subject: Electionlawblog news and commentary 8/14/06 |
From: Rick Hasen |
Date: 8/14/2006, 7:28 AM |
To: election-law |
A.P. offers this
report.
John Fund offers this Wall
Street Journal column.
George Skelton has written this
LA Times column,
which begins: "California Democrats -- especially U.S. House candidates
-- should be poised to clean up in November because of President Bush's
bungling, but they're not. And it's their own fault. They've
gerrymandered themselves out of the action."
Bob Bauer and Larry Gold have written this
Roll Call oped
(paid subscription required), which begins: "On Aug. 29, the Federal
Election Commission will consider adopting a rule, to take effect
immediately, that authorizes unions, other nonprofits and business
corporations to finance 'grass-roots lobbying' ads in the period before
November elections. Without this rule, any such ad, on any policy
issue, within 60 days of the general election would be prohibited if it
referred to elected officials who happened also to be candidates. The
proposed rule tightly would condition this exemption on the content of
the ads, strictly disallowing any electoral messages in support of or
opposition to the named candidate." Bob amplifies his thoughts and
responds to critics of his oped piece with Jan Baran that appeared in
last week's NY Times here.
These
letters ran in today's NY Times, in response to this
oped by Norm Ornstein.
The uncertainty created by Padilla v. Lever hits
Santa Clara county. I would hope that the Ninth Circuit will issue
its en banc opinion soon to end the uncertainty.
These
letters to the editor respond to this
oped published Aug 8 in the NY Times by Jan Baran and Bob Bauer.
See this
report in the Dallas Morning News.
The Contra Costa Times offers this
report
on how California gubernatorial candidates are using initiatives as
part of a political strategy, something I've written about in Parties
Take the Initiative, 100 Columbia Law Review 731 (2000) and Rethinking
the Unconstitutionality of Contribution and Expenditure Limits in
Ballot Measure Campaigns, 78 Southern California Law Review 885 (2005).
See also this
Contra Costa Times article on the large ballot California voters
will face in November.
See the opinion pieces by Dan
Weintraub and Dan
Walters.
See this
report from New Zealand. Thanks to Andrew Geddis for the pointer.
-- Rick Hasen William H. Hannon Distinguished Professor of Law Loyola Law School 919 Albany Street Los Angeles, CA 90015-1211 (213)736-1466 (213)380-3769 - fax rick.hasen@lls.edu http://www.lls.edu/academics/faculty/hasen.html http://electionlawblog.org