Subject: Re: [EL] question about McComish v Bennett |
From: Rick Hasen |
Date: 9/27/2010, 6:27 PM |
To: "richardwinger@yahoo.com" <richardwinger@yahoo.com> |
CC: "election-law@mailman.lls.edu" <election-law@mailman.lls.edu> |
Reply-to: "rick.hasen@lls.edu" |
The 9th circuit opinion upholding extra public funding for candidates with privately-funded opponents with lots of contributions is McComish v Bennett. The 9th reported its decision at 605 F 3d 720, decided May 21,2010.
On June 23 the 9th circuit amended its opinion, after it had been published. So the amended 9th circuit opinion is 611 F 3d 510.
I can't find any difference between the text of the two reported decisions. Can anyone tell me what changed? Thank you.
_______________________________________________ election-law mailing list election-law@mailman.lls.edu http://mailman.lls.edu/mailman/listinfo/election-law
-- Rick Hasen William H. Hannon Distinguished Professor of Law Loyola Law School 919 Albany Street Los Angeles, CA 90015-1211 (213)736-1466 (213)380-3769 - fax rick.hasen@lls.edu http://www.lls.edu/academics/faculty/hasen.html http://electionlawblog.org