Subject: Re: [EL] Electionlawblog news and commentary 9/28/10 |
From: "Kelner, Robert" <rkelner@cov.com> |
Date: 9/28/2010, 3:39 AM |
To: "'rick.hasen@lls.edu'" <rick.hasen@lls.edu>, "'election-law@mailman.lls.edu'" <election-law@mailman.lls.edu> |
AP:
"Just five weeks from midterm elections, groups allied with the
Republican Party and financed in part by corporations and
millionaires have amassed a crushing 6-1 advantage in television
spending, and now are dominating the airwaves in closely
contested districts and states across the country."
Who turned on
the corporate spigot? Oh
yeah.
The NY Times offers this
report.
See here.
Following up on this
post, a West Virginia state supreme court justice has, on
further consideration, reversed himself and decided to recuse in
a case, citing Tony Mauro's earlier post on the case. (Original
story:
"A West Virginia Supreme Court justice has refused to take
himself out of a case involving the state cap on non-economic
damages, even though he pledged during his election campaign
that he would never vote to overturn the law imposing the
cap."). And the justice is not happy about the power of the
blogosphere, which he says forced him to recuse in this case:
AP offers this
report about how NOM wants to to run ads in the Rhode
Island governor's race but not comply with laws imposed on
political committees. A press release I received said the
pleadings are on the James Madison Center's website, but so
far I don't see them there.
UPDATE: There's also a NOM challenge in Florida, which I think
will eventually appear on the Center's web page.
Brenda Wright blogs
at the ACS blog.
Salon reports.
-- Rick Hasen William H. Hannon Distinguished Professor of Law Loyola Law School 919 Albany Street Los Angeles, CA 90015-1211 (213)736-1466 (213)380-3769 - fax rick.hasen@lls.edu http://www.lls.edu/academics/faculty/hasen.html http://electionlawblog.org