Subject: Re: [EL] CCP Responds to Crossroads GPS and U.S. Chamber Allegations |
From: "rlenhard@comcast.net" <rlenhard@comcast.net> |
Date: 10/8/2010, 5:58 AM |
To: Jeff Patch |
CC: Election Law <election-law@mailman.lls.edu> |
Jeff:
My sense was that few if any labor unions have foreign affiliates. Years ago the UAW had a sizable Canadian affiliate, but they split off into a separate Canada-only entity. While the national unions are often called "The International Brotherhood of...." that is more a legacy of an earlier era of international labor solidarity as a philosophical belief, rather than a reflection of actual geographical scope of the entity. American unions will often "affiliate" with international labor federations, but these entities are more akin to a trade association, and the flow of money is from the US in the form of dues to the international entity. Despite efforts decades ago to build an international workers movements, labor unions around the world are very country-specific. So as a practical matter, while there may be US unions that have a non-US "local" that would be paying dues money from overseas to the United States, it would be the exception rather than the norm.
Bob Lenhard
----- Original Message -----
From: "Jeff Patch" <jpatch@campaignfreedom.org>
To: "Election Law" <election-law@mailman.lls.edu>
Sent: Thursday, October 7, 2010 4:08:38 PM
Subject: Re: [EL] CCP Responds to Crossroads GPS and U.S. Chamber Allegations
This NPR report is a good example of why many of us think NPR is left-leaning on campaign finance issues. Their program featured two liberal journalists and, for balance, Ken Vogel of Politico—probably the fairest campaign finance reporter around.
Vogel’s snippet that NPR published is relatively straightforward—of course Rove and Gillespie are involved with these groups and conservatives will be grateful for their support. Peter Stone basically rehashes the issues in the CLC/D21 letter alleging that Crossroads GPS is violating its 501(c)(4) status despite existing for only a few months into the fiscal year.
Lee Fang finishes the segment synopsis discussing his blog post alleging the Chamber accepts foreign funding for its political advocacy program. NPR doesn’t even bother to report a denial of the Chamber that foreign funds are being used for political spending [By the way, the NPR report is incorrect that the Chamber has raised $75 million for political spending. That has been the reported spending plan, but Roll Call noted recently that they’ve actually spent far less than that amount].
On a related note, Trevor Potter and I both queried the list Tuesday asking whether or not this “foreign funding” issue would apply to international labor unions.
Trevor asked a structural question (whether or not international unions such as the AFL-CIO or IBEW actually accept foreign payments from affiliates) and I asked if a similar question: if unions accept these payments—or dues from foreign nationals—do they use a similar “internal accounting procedure” as the Chamber to safeguard that the funds are not spent on American politics?
It’s frustrating that practitioners and academics can spend countless e-mail exchanges on trivial matters, but no one bothers to respond to serious inquiries from both sides of the campaign finance ideological spectrum concerning matters of great media attention and consequence.
Seeing no response, I contacted attorneys and communications officials for seven unions that have over 50,000 Canadian members. Only the SEIU replied, noting that they go an extra step to segregate their foreign funds into a different account.
Considering six of the unions declined to respond, I’d deem it relatively likely that at least one of these unions has a similar accounting procedure as the Chamber. I’m still waiting for more information.
Jeff Patch
Communications Director
Center for Competitive Politics
124 S. West St. | Suite 201 | Alexandria, VA 22314
p: (703) 894-6824 | c: (202) 527-2598
From: election-law-bounces@mailman.lls.edu [mailto:election-law-bounces@mailman.lls.edu] On Behalf Of dasmith
Sent: Thursday, October 07, 2010 3:31 PM
To: Rick Hasen
Cc: Election Law
Subject: [EL] CCP Responds to Crossroads GPS and U.S. Chamber Allegations
Worth a listen: Terry Gross' 'Citizens United' Ruling Opened Floodgates On Groups' Ad Spending
dan
The Center for Competitive Politics has issued this memo, responding to the Campaign Legal Center and Democracy 21's complaint against Crossroad GPS and Think Progress' allegation of foreign funding for the U.S. Chamber of Commerce's political activities, both noted here.
Posted by Dan Tokaji at 09:39 AM