Subject: Re: [EL] Justice Kennedy, DISCLOSE-- and on to the States! |
From: Trevor Potter |
Date: 10/21/2010, 1:47 PM |
To: Roy Schotland <schotlan@law.georgetown.edu>, Rick Hasen <rick.hasen@lls.edu>, Election Law <election-law@mailman.lls.edu> |
Rick is right (his
posting several days ago) about who are the culprits responsible for how sad is
the current Disclosure picture (with major blame on Ds, in House as well as
Senate). Rick disagrees with leading jurisprude Joe Conason’s foolishly
blaming Justice Kennedy for the current state of disclosure. Critic
Conason ignores that the Kennedy opinion’s treatment on disclosure got only four
votes, Thomas not joining that part. And the critic ignores the high
odds that if Kennedy hadn’t authored the opinion, one of the radical Justices
woulda, probably with damage to disclosure. Ironically, Conason accuses
Kennedy of “naïvete”.
In a posting last
week I noted the DISCLOSE bill’s five fatal flaws. With that bill, my
party’s Members of Congress blew our best opportunity to update disclosure
law. Given that after the election it will be even harder (for several
reasons) to change FECA, let’s remember the States. Even in the many
pro-disclosure States, requirements have been obsolete (at least since WRTL) in
being limited to “express advocacy” ads. Never has more public attention
been given to the need for disclosure. Shouldn’t energies go into
effective bills in XYZ States?
Roy
A. Schotland
Professor
Emeritus
Georgetown
Law Center
600
New Jersey Ave. N.W.
Washington,
D.C. 20001
202/662-9098
fax: -9680
<- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -> To ensure compliance with requirements imposed by the IRS, we inform you that, unless specifically indicated otherwise, any tax advice contained in this communication (including any attachments) was not intended or written to be used, and cannot be used, for the purpose of (i) avoiding tax-related penalties under the Internal Revenue Code, or (ii) promoting, marketing, or recommending to another party any tax-related matter addressed herein. This message is for the use of the intended recipient only. It is from a law firm and may contain information that is privileged and confidential. If you are not the intended recipient any disclosure, copying, future distribution, or use of this communication is prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please advise us by return e-mail, or if you have received this communication by fax advise us by telephone and delete/destroy the document. |