Subject: Re: [EL] Justice Kennedy, DISCLOSE-- and on to the States! |
From: Roy Schotland |
Date: 10/21/2010, 1:23 PM |
To: Rick Hasen <rick.hasen@lls.edu>, Election Law <election-law@mailman.lls.edu> |
Rick
is right (his posting several days ago) about who are the culprits responsible
for how sad is the current Disclosure picture (with major blame on Ds, in House
as well as Senate). Rick disagrees with leading jurisprude Joe Conason’s foolishly
blaming Justice Kennedy for the current state of disclosure. Critic Conason ignores
that the Kennedy opinion’s treatment on disclosure got only four votes, Thomas not
joining that part. And the critic ignores the high odds that if Kennedy hadn’t
authored the opinion, one of the radical Justices woulda, probably with damage
to disclosure. Ironically, Conason accuses Kennedy of “naïvete”.
In
a posting last week I noted the DISCLOSE bill’s five fatal flaws. With
that bill, my party’s Members of Congress blew our best opportunity to update
disclosure law. Given that after the election it will be even harder (for
several reasons) to change FECA, let’s remember the States. Even in the
many pro-disclosure States, requirements have been obsolete (at least since
WRTL) in being limited to “express advocacy” ads. Never has more public
attention been given to the need for disclosure. Shouldn’t energies go
into effective bills in XYZ States?
Roy A. Schotland
Professor Emeritus
Georgetown Law Center
600 New Jersey Ave. N.W.
Washington, D.C. 20001
202/662-9098
fax: -9680