The rhetoric in this press release is totally NSFNP (not safe for
non-partisans), but a group lead by Kevin Zeese is offering 20 grand
for definitive evidence of e-voting manipulation in the 2010 election
that shows a contest elected the incorrect candidate (must lead to
arrest and conviction).
http://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/election-watchdog-group-offers-20000-reward-calls-on-all-computer-scientists-it-specialists-and-hackers-to-monitor-2010-election-tabulators-for-illegal-manipulations-105666738.html
shorter URL: http://bit.ly/9wsBLE
Personally, I'd rather bounties be proposed for other aims, like "best
local election administration in a state" or "best ratio of turnout
over median voter wait time"... with enough funding and imagination,
we could have a rich prize system and could call it the "Voties" or
something... and it might have a nice side effect of providing good
data that could be further critiqued by academics and election
administrators while also giving a bump to election administrators.
::) (The Election Center must do this, right?)
best, Joe