Subject: [EL] Electionlawblog news and commentary 11/2/10 |
From: Rick Hasen |
Date: 11/2/2010, 9:32 AM |
To: Election Law |
See this
article about this
decision issued late last week. Thanks to Michael Solimine
for passing these along.
WaPo offers this
report.
Tracking
the Money Spent on Campaign Ads (Peter Overby) and For
Voters Who Need Help, Sites and Apps Aplenty (Pam
Fessler).
Scroll down here
to the entry beginning: "The Alexi Giannoulias campaign..."
AP offers this
report.
Graeme Orr has just written this
book for Federation Press in Australia. The book is
described as "the first dedicated monograph on the law on
democratic politics in Australia. It synthesises the law on
elections, with a central focus on political parties,
parliamentary elections and referenda at Federal and State
levels."
I look forward to reading this book. I am a huge fan of Graeme's
earlier work, and found it very helpful as I tried to understand
both Australian election administration issues and campaign
finance issues. Highly recommended!
Mother Jones on redistricting.
DeWayne Wickham has written this
USA Today column.
This
item appears on the "Facing South" blog.
Dan Froomkin reports
at HuffPo.
Joel Connelly has written this
column for the Seattle PI.
Following up on this
post, see here.
Election officials don't even have plans
to try to count all the ballots Tuesday.
CQ-Roll Call offers this
report.
CQ-Roll Call offers this
report.
WaPo offers this
report.
Washington Times editorial:
Watch for voter fraud "epidemic" tomorrow. It would be sad if
the effect of this were not so pernicious.
Jacksonville (Fla): Brown
campaign offers free meals for early voters. Wonder if a
letter will be coming from DOJ?
I've been blogging a lot about this question, from tacos
to ice
cream: federal law is clear that you cannot offer any
incentive for people to turn out to vote, in elections when
federal candidates are on the ballot. So I praised
WWE (associated with Conn. Republican Senate candidate McMahon)
when they announced
free giveaways near polling places on a "first come, first
served" basis, without proof of voting. So I was
surprised when DOJ sent this
warning letter to WWE. I wonder whether others have gotten
such a letter. In any case, WWE has affirmed
that one need not vote to get the gear, and that should end the
matter. If this was targeted only at WWE and not sent to other
entities similarly situated, I'd find that troubling.
-- Rick Hasen William H. Hannon Distinguished Professor of Law Loyola Law School 919 Albany Street Los Angeles, CA 90015-1211 (213)736-1466 (213)380-3769 - fax rick.hasen@lls.edu http://www.lls.edu/academics/faculty/hasen.html http://electionlawblog.org