Subject: Re: [EL] 2010 turnout estimates
From: "Smith, Brad" <BSmith@law.capital.edu>
Date: 11/3/2010, 11:28 AM
To: Craig Holman
CC: "election-law@mailman.lls.edu" <election-law@mailman.lls.edu>

I don't know how all pollsters do it, but here are a few:
 
Rasmussen:  Are you a Republican?
 
Gallup:  Do you have a cell phone (if yes, mark as "not likely voter").
 
Daily Kos/Research 2000:  Voter screens?  We don't need no stinkin' voter screens to get answers!
 
Pew:  We have a 137 question test that examines the respondent's reading habits, diet, and 64 other measures of compatibility with voting behavior. 
 
Zogby:  Got an internet connection?  Give us your thoughts?
 
 
 
Bradley A. Smith
Josiah H. Blackmore II/Shirley M. Nault Designated Professor of Law
Capital University Law School
303 E. Broad St.
Columbus, OH 43215
(614) 236-6317
http://www.law.capital.edu/Faculty/Bios/bsmith.asp


From: election-law-bounces@mailman.lls.edu on behalf of Craig Holman
Sent: Wed 11/3/2010 1:20 PM
To: mmcdon@gmu.edu
Cc: election-law@mailman.lls.edu
Subject: Re: [EL] 2010 turnout estimates

Michael and/or others on this listserv:

How do pollsters measure whether a survey respondent is a "likely voter?" Is there a standard methodology to this, or is this also an issue of dispute among pollsters?


Craig Holman, Ph.D.
Government Affairs Lobbyist
Public Citizen
215 Pennsylvania Avenue NE
Washington, D.C. 20003
TEL: (202) 454-5182
CEL: (202) 905-7413
FAX: (202) 547-7392


-----Original Message-----
From: Jason Rylander <jasonrylander@gmail.com>
To: Michael McDonald <mmcdon@gmu.edu>
Cc: election-law <election-law@mailman.lls.edu>
Sent: Wed, Nov 3, 2010 12:57 pm
Subject: Re: [EL] 2010 turnout estimates

http://yglesias.thinkprogress.org/2010/11/the-changing-electorate/

Here is a chart to illustrate Michael's point. 

Young voters simply did not turn out for this election (though they voted Democratic by 57-40, about the same margin as 2008).  As a share of the electorate, however, seniors rose dramatically in 2010.  Who turned out, far more than the theory that Americans were reacting to "liberal overreach," is the key to understanding these results.  

All bets are off for 2012.

Jason Rylander

Attorney-at-Law
Arlington, VA

On Wed, Nov 3, 2010 at 11:39 AM, Michael McDonald <mmcdon@gmu.edu> wrote:
Conversely, and I think this was the point that Dan was trying to make, is that turnout will be higher in 2012 and the electorate will be much different...younger, more minorities, more poor people, i.e., as Pew noted about non-voters, more Democrats.
 
============
Dr. Michael P. McDonald
Associate Professor, George Mason University
Non-Resident Senior Fellow, Brookings Institution
 
                             Mailing address:
(o) 703-993-4191             George Mason University
(f) 703-993-1399             Dept. of Public and International Affairs
mmcdon@gmu.edu               4400 University Drive - 3F4
http://elections.gmu.edu     Fairfax, VA 22030-4444
 
From: election-law-bounces@mailman.lls.edu [mailto:election-law-bounces@mailman.lls.edu] On Behalf Of Lorraine C. Minnite
Sent: Wednesday, November 03, 2010 11:12 AM
To: election-law@mailman.lls.edu
Subject: Re: [EL] 2010 turnout estimates
 
As Curtis Gans notes, and I would add - midterm turnout rates have dropped in comparison to turnout in the preceding presidential election for 170 years.  According to the CPS, as a percentage of the immediately preceding presidential election, turnout dropped 27 percent in 1998, and 28 percent in 2002, and 33 percent in 2006.  With respect to trends in midterm voting and the relationship between midterms and their immediately preceding presidential elections, the growth in turnout in 2010 compared to 2006 is significant, but drop-off, at about 32 percent is not.  See the research memo I wrote for Project Vote for more analysis: http://www.projectvote.org/blog/?p=1045.  I will have more to say about this in a few days.

Lori Minnite

On 11/3/10 10:10 AM, Dan Johnson-Weinberger wrote:
Thanks Michael.
 
132.6 million voted in 2008
90.1 million voted yesterday.
 
That's a drop in the size of the American electorate of almost a third.
 
Dan
On Wed, Nov 3, 2010 at 3:18 AM, Michael McDonald <mmcdon@gmu.edu> wrote:
Below is a link to my turnout estimates based on the vote counted to date and the outstanding vote as projected by the Associated Press. There is still some uncertainty to these estimates, especially for the high mail ballot states. I forecasted a turnout rate of 41.3% for those eligible to vote and the estimated turnout so far is 41.4%.  In raw numbers, 90.1 million votes forecasted and 90.2 million votes estimated from actual election results. There is, of course, error among the states that happened to have a mean close to zero.
 
 
============
Dr. Michael P. McDonald
Associate Professor, George Mason University
Non-Resident Senior Fellow, Brookings Institution
 
                             Mailing address:
(o) 703-993-4191             George Mason University
(f) 703-993-1399             Dept. of Public and International Affairs
mmcdon@gmu.edu               4400 University Drive - 3F4
http://elections.gmu.edu     Fairfax, VA 22030-4444
 

_______________________________________________
election-law mailing list
election-law@mailman.lls.edu
http://mailman.lls.edu/mailman/listinfo/election-law



--
Dan Johnson-Weinberger

Attorney at Law
111 West Washington, Suite 1920
Chicago, Illinois 60602

312.867.5377 (office)
312.933.4890 (mobile)
312.794.7064 (fax)
 
 
_______________________________________________
election-law mailing list
election-law@mailman.lls.edu
http://mailman.lls.edu/mailman/listinfo/election-law

_______________________________________________
election-law mailing list
election-law@mailman.lls.edu
http://mailman.lls.edu/mailman/listinfo/election-law


_______________________________________________
election-law mailing list
election-law@mailman.lls.edu
http://mailman.lls.edu/mailman/listinfo/election-law