"Kirk Offers Hope vs. Secret Donors"
I have just written this
oped for Politico. Here is a snippet:
The temptation to use secret funds is only likely to increase in
2012, when not only Congress but the presidency is on the line.
The astronomical spending of 2008 could well multiply in 2012 --
and a huge chunk of that is sure to come from secret
contributors. Unless something is done.
There is only a small window of time for Congress to address
this -- the lame-duck session.
Democrats have tried to pass the DISCLOSE Act, which could solve
most of these problems. Though it passed the House, it was
filibustered in the Senate. Entreaties to moderate Republicans
Olympia Snowe (Maine), Susan Collins (Maine) and Scott Brown
(Mass.) to cross and vote with Democrats were to no avail.
Prospects could be far worse in the next Congress. There will be
five fewer Democrats in the Senate, making a filibuster that
much harder to break.
More important, there's no reason to believe that the soon-to-be
Republican House would vote for meaningful disclosure
provisions. Not only is much of the conservative GOP leadership
ideologically opposed to campaign finance regulation on
principle; they are not likely to vote to scuttle a system that
served them so well this year.
Due to a quirk in the law, however, Sen. Mark Kirk (R-Ill.)
takes his seat now -- replacing the appointee Sen. Ronald Burris
during this month's lame-duck session. Kirk has said that he's a
supporter of McCain-Feingold. During his campaign, he actually
spoke out in favor of better disclosure laws.
Kirk should take the lead in pushing a disclosure bill through
this lame-duck session of Congress. He should also urge the
remaining Republican moderates to cross party lines with him.
These GOP moderate senators should not be asked to sign on to
the DISCLOSE Act. That measure, in addition to disclosure
provisions, was larded with other provisions of questionable
constitutionality -- including new limits on corporate spending
by certain corporations, like government contractors.
Posted by Rick Hasen at
06:48
AM
Scheduled to Be on Brian Lehrer Show This
Morning Talking About Iowa Retention Election Controversy
You should also be able to listen here just
after 10 eastern.
Posted by Rick Hasen at
06:43
AM
No Surprises Dept.
AP:
Incoming Kansas SOS Kobach's first priority is a voter id law.
Posted by Rick Hasen at
08:23
PM
Will Emmer Not Concede in Minnesota in an Effort
to Keep a Republican Governor in Office Longer?
That's a possible implication of this
article.
Posted by Rick Hasen at
08:15
PM
Will Washington State Supreme Court Race Go to a
Recount?
Could
be. The U.S. Senate race in that state is over.
Posted by Rick Hasen at
08:04
PM
"Campaign Cash: Tea Party Vows To Block Campaign
Finance Reform"
This
is interesting. I wonder if the Tea Partiers know what Senator-elect
Rand Paul has said about campaign finance regulation.
Posted by Rick Hasen at
04:24
PM
Doug Johnson on the Florida Redistricting
Measures
See here
[corrected link].
Posted by Rick Hasen at
03:34
PM
Texas Governor Perry Calls Voting Rights Act
Section 5 Extension in 2006 "Unconstitutional"
From page 111
of Governor Perry's new book, Fed
Up! Our Fight to Save America from Washington: "Congress
passed 'temporary' provisions [of the Voting Rights Act] more
than 40 years ago to ensure compliance but has
unconstitutionally extended those provisions repeatedly since
that time, including most recently in 2006 for an unbelievable
25 years."
Posted by Rick Hasen at
01:00
PM
"Former Coleman attorney, law experts: Emmer has
steep hill to climb"
Minnesota Public Radio offers this
report.
Posted by Rick Hasen at
11:20
AM
More on the Move From Judicial Elections
As a further follow up to this
post, this
publication from the American Judicature Society spells
out all of the changes to and away from judicial elections in
recent decades. The most recent change away from
elections appears to have been in Utah in 1985. There have been
a number of unsuccessful attempts to move in that direction
since then.
Posted by Rick Hasen at
11:12
AM
"Corrupting Committees: Sen. Jim DeMint's
cynical advice to incoming Tea Partiers."
Timothy Noah has this
interesting Slate piece.
Posted by Rick Hasen at
10:33
AM