Subject: [EL] New York Re-Redistricting on Deck? |
From: Michael McDonald |
Date: 11/10/2010, 11:20 AM |
To: "election-law@mailman.lls.edu" <election-law@mailman.lls.edu> |
As I have been writing up what the 2010 elections may mean
for congressional redistricting (http://www.publicmapping.org/redistricting-forecast),
I realized a potential tie in the NY state Senate may set up a re-redistricting
scenario for New York. Here is how it could play out...
- The typical bipartisan compromise on state legislative
redistricting is for each chamber to draw their own districts. For this to
occur in the NY Senate, Democrats and Republicans will have to compromise.
Maybe they can, but that compromise would likely be less favorable to the
Republicans than the typical Republican gerrymanders over the past three
decades that have helped them retain control of the chamber. So, either the
maps go to court, where a "fair" map more reflects Democratic
strength in the state or the bipartisan compromise puts more pressure on Senate
Republicans in 2012, which should be a better year for Democrats.
- If Democrats expect to control the state Senate and House after
2012, they could refuse to compromise with the Republicans on a congressional
map and the map will go to court.
- In 2013, if the court map is not as favorable to them as
they may like, Democrats could then do a congressional redistricting -- there
is no prohibition on congressional timing. If a court draws the state Senate
map and Democrats gain control of the chamber in 2012, they could also use
their one-bite-at-the-apple chance to do a re-redistricting of the state Senate,
too.
An interesting game of chicken may unfold in New York. Democrats
may have greater leverage since they may be better off if they do not compromise
than Republicans if they do not. But neither side will particularly want a
court to draw the maps since it puts their incumbents at greater risk.
Justin Levitt and I discuss these state prohibitions on re-redistricting
in:
Justin Levitt and Michael P. McDonald. 2007. "Taking
the 'Re' out of Redistricting: State Constitutional Provisions on Redistricting
Timing." Georgetown
Law Review 95(4): 1247-86. (Also available on SSRN).
Here is the relevant state constitution language on New York
state legislative redistricting timing:
Article III §4. Except as herein otherwise provided, the
federal census taken in the year nineteen hundred thirty and each federal
census taken decennially thereafter shall be controlling as to the number of
inhabitants in the state or any part thereof for the purposes of the
apportionment of members of assembly and readjustment or alteration of senate
and assembly districts next occurring, in so far as such census and the
tabulation thereof purport to give the information necessary therefor. The
legislature, by law, shall provide for the making and tabulation by state
authorities of an enumeration of the inhabitants of the entire state to be used
for such purposes, instead of a federal census, if the taking of a federal
census in any tenth year from the year nineteen hundred thirty be omitted or if
the federal census fails to show the number of aliens or Indians not taxed. If
a federal census, though giving the requisite information as to the state at
large, fails to give the information as to any civil or territorial divisions
which is required to be known for such purposes, the legislature, by law, shall
provide for such an enumeration of the inhabitants of such parts of the state
only as may be necessary, which shall supersede in part the federal census and
be used in connection therewith for such purposes. The legislature, by law, may
provide in its discretion for an enumeration by state authorities of the
inhabitants of the state, to be used for such purposes, in place of a federal
census, when the return of a decennial federal census is delayed so that it is
not available at the beginning of the regular session of the legislature in the
second year after the year nineteen hundred thirty or after any tenth year therefrom,
or if an apportionment of members of assembly and readjustment or alteration of
senate districts is not made at or before such a session. At the regular
session in the year nineteen hundred thirty-two, and at the first regular
session after the year nineteen hundred forty and after each tenth year
therefrom the senate districts shall be readjusted or altered, but if, in any
decade, counting from and including that which begins with the year nineteen
hundred thirty-one, such a readjustment or alteration is not made at the time
above prescribed, it shall be made at a subsequent session occurring not later
than the sixth year of such decade, meaning not later than nineteen hundred
thirty-six, nineteen hundred forty-six, nineteen hundred fifty-six, and so on;
provided, however, that if such districts shall have been readjusted or altered
by law in either of the years nineteen hundred thirty or nineteen hundred
thirty-one, they shall remain unaltered until the first regular session after
the year nineteen hundred forty. Such districts shall be so readjusted or
altered that each senate district shall contain as nearly as may be an equal
number of inhabitants, excluding aliens, and be in as compact form as
practicable, and shall remain unaltered until the first year of the next decade
as above defined, and shall at all times consist of contiguous territory, and
no county shall be divided in the formation of a senate district except to make
two or more senate districts wholly in such county. No town, except a town
having more than a full ratio of apportionment, and no block in a city inclosed
by streets or public ways, shall be divided in the formation of senate
districts; nor shall any district contain a greater excess in population over
an adjoining district in the same county, than the population of a town or
block therein adjoining such district. Counties, towns or blocks which, from
their location, may be included in either of two districts, shall be so placed
as to make said districts most nearly equal in number of inhabitants, excluding
aliens.
============
Dr. Michael
P. McDonald
Associate
Professor, George Mason University
Non-Resident
Senior Fellow, Brookings Institution
Mailing address:
(o)
703-993-4191
George
Mason University
(f)
703-993-1399
Dept. of Public and International Affairs
mmcdon@gmu.edu
4400 University Drive - 3F4
http://elections.gmu.edu
Fairfax, VA 22030-4444