Subject: Re: [EL] New York Re-Redistricting on Deck? |
From: Sean Parnell |
Date: 11/10/2010, 1:21 PM |
To: "election-law@mailman.lls.edu" <election-law@mailman.lls.edu> |
The Prison Policy Project has been working on this issue and
could probably provide insight into how this will happen. From what I
understand there will be an impact in those areas that have prisons, but the
“home” counties of incarcerated felons won’t really see that much of an impact.
You can find info here: http://www.prisonersofthecensus.org/
Sean Parnell
President
Center for Competitive Politics
http://www.campaignfreedom.org
http://www.twitter.com/seanparnellccp
124 S. West Street, #201
Alexandria, VA 22310
(703) 894-6800 phone
(703) 894-6813 direct
(703) 894-6811 fax
From:
election-law-bounces@mailman.lls.edu
[mailto:election-law-bounces@mailman.lls.edu] On Behalf Of Margaret
Groarke
Sent: Wednesday, November 10, 2010 3:01 PM
To: Michael McDonald
Cc: election-law@mailman.lls.edu
Subject: Re: [EL] New York Re-Redistricting on Deck?
Another interesting wrinkle in the redistricting for NY is
that NY state has passed a law requiring inmates to be counted for
redistricting purposes as residents at their last known address, not their
prison cell.
This should mean a significant change in the relative
populations of counties and districts with prisons and counties who send a lot
of folks to prison.
Anyone on the list have any
insights into how this will be done?
On Wed, Nov 10, 2010 at 2:20 PM, Michael McDonald <mmcdon@gmu.edu> wrote:
As
I have been writing up what the 2010 elections may mean for congressional
redistricting (http://www.publicmapping.org/redistricting-forecast), I
realized a potential tie in the NY state Senate may set up a re-redistricting
scenario for New York. Here is how it could play out...
-
The typical bipartisan compromise on state legislative redistricting is for
each chamber to draw their own districts. For this to occur in the NY Senate,
Democrats and Republicans will have to compromise. Maybe they can, but that
compromise would likely be less favorable to the Republicans than the typical
Republican gerrymanders over the past three decades that have helped them
retain control of the chamber. So, either the maps go to court, where a
"fair" map more reflects Democratic strength in the state or the
bipartisan compromise puts more pressure on Senate Republicans in 2012, which
should be a better year for Democrats.
-
If Democrats expect to control the state Senate and House after 2012, they
could refuse to compromise with the Republicans on a congressional map and the
map will go to court.
-
In 2013, if the court map is not as favorable to them as they may like,
Democrats could then do a congressional redistricting -- there is no
prohibition on congressional timing. If a court draws the state Senate map and
Democrats gain control of the chamber in 2012, they could also use their
one-bite-at-the-apple chance to do a re-redistricting of the state Senate, too.
An
interesting game of chicken may unfold in New York. Democrats may have greater
leverage since they may be better off if they do not compromise than Republicans
if they do not. But neither side will particularly want a court to draw
the maps since it puts their incumbents at greater risk.
Justin
Levitt and I discuss these state prohibitions on re-redistricting in:
Justin
Levitt and Michael P. McDonald. 2007. "Taking the 'Re' out of
Redistricting: State Constitutional Provisions on Redistricting
Timing." Georgetown Law Review 95(4): 1247-86. (Also
available on SSRN).
Here
is the relevant state constitution language on New York state legislative redistricting
timing:
Article
III §4. Except as herein otherwise provided, the federal census taken in the
year nineteen hundred thirty and each federal census taken decennially
thereafter shall be controlling as to the number of inhabitants in the state or
any part thereof for the purposes of the apportionment of members of assembly
and readjustment or alteration of senate and assembly districts next occurring,
in so far as such census and the tabulation thereof purport to give the
information necessary therefor. The legislature, by law, shall provide for the
making and tabulation by state authorities of an enumeration of the inhabitants
of the entire state to be used for such purposes, instead of a federal census,
if the taking of a federal census in any tenth year from the year nineteen
hundred thirty be omitted or if the federal census fails to show the number of
aliens or Indians not taxed. If a federal census, though giving the requisite
information as to the state at large, fails to give the information as to any
civil or territorial divisions which is required to be known for such purposes,
the legislature, by law, shall provide for such an enumeration of the
inhabitants of such parts of the state only as may be necessary, which shall
supersede in part the federal census and be used in connection therewith for
such purposes. The legislature, by law, may provide in its discretion for an
enumeration by state authorities of the inhabitants of the state, to be used
for such purposes, in place of a federal census, when the return of a decennial
federal census is delayed so that it is not available at the beginning of the
regular session of the legislature in the second year after the year nineteen
hundred thirty or after any tenth year therefrom, or if an apportionment of
members of assembly and readjustment or alteration of senate districts is not
made at or before such a session. At the regular session in the year nineteen
hundred thirty-two, and at the first regular session after the year nineteen
hundred forty and after each tenth year therefrom the senate districts shall be
readjusted or altered, but if, in any decade, counting from and including that
which begins with the year nineteen hundred thirty-one, such a readjustment or
alteration is not made at the time above prescribed, it shall be made at a
subsequent session occurring not later than the sixth year of such decade,
meaning not later than nineteen hundred thirty-six, nineteen hundred forty-six,
nineteen hundred fifty-six, and so on; provided, however, that if such
districts shall have been readjusted or altered by law in either of the years
nineteen hundred thirty or nineteen hundred thirty-one, they shall remain
unaltered until the first regular session after the year nineteen hundred
forty. Such districts shall be so readjusted or altered that each senate
district shall contain as nearly as may be an equal number of inhabitants,
excluding aliens, and be in as compact form as practicable, and shall remain
unaltered until the first year of the next decade as above defined, and shall
at all times consist of contiguous territory, and no county shall be divided in
the formation of a senate district except to make two or more senate districts
wholly in such county. No town, except a town having more than a full ratio of
apportionment, and no block in a city inclosed by streets or public ways, shall
be divided in the formation of senate districts; nor shall any district contain
a greater excess in population over an adjoining district in the same county, than
the population of a town or block therein adjoining such district. Counties,
towns or blocks which, from their location, may be included in either of two
districts, shall be so placed as to make said districts most nearly equal in
number of inhabitants, excluding aliens.
============
Dr. Michael P. McDonald
Associate Professor, George Mason
University
Non-Resident Senior Fellow,
Brookings Institution
Mailing address:
(o) 703-993-4191
George
Mason University
(f)
703-993-1399
Dept. of Public and International Affairs
mmcdon@gmu.edu
4400 University Drive - 3F4
http://elections.gmu.edu Fairfax,
VA 22030-4444
_______________________________________________
election-law mailing list
election-law@mailman.lls.edu
http://mailman.lls.edu/mailman/listinfo/election-law
--
Margaret Groarke
Director, Peace Studies Program
Associate Professor, Government
Manhattan College
4513 Manhattan College Parkway
Bronx, NY 10471
718-862-7943 (office)
718-862-7943 (office)