Subject: [EL] Fwd: Question(s) for the listserve
From: Rick Hasen
Date: 11/15/2010, 8:21 AM
To: Election Law


See below.

-------- Original Message --------
Subject: [EL] Question(s) for the listserve
Date: Mon, 15 Nov 2010 08:32:16 -0700
From: Paris Nelson <Paris.Nelson@SOS.STATE.CO.US>
To: election-law@mailman.lls.edu


Rick,

Would you be so kind as to send the following two questions out to the listserve? I would appreciate it!

Thanks. -Paris

 

Two (unrelated) questions:

 

1.       Is anyone aware of a good definition of “major purpose” as applied to political committees, in either in law or simply proposed? Language used in other contexts (in election law or otherwise) is helpful, as well.

 

2.       As many of you are probably aware, the Tenth Circuit issued a ruling last week rendering our definition of “issue committee” unconstitutional as a violation of the freedom of association, but the Court did not provide much guidance to us as to where the line is for “small” groups that are not subject to the law. Do other states have standards for what constitutes a “small” issues committee that is exempt from disclosure laws? Any ideas as to what a federal court might consider tolerable? Our threshold (struck down) is currently $200 raised or spent supporting or opposing an issue, and that is clearly too low.

 

Any guidance would be much appreciated. You may email me directly at paris.nelson@sos.state.co.us, or reply to the list. Thanks in advance!

 

Paris

 

Paris Nelson

Elections Division - Campaign Finance Legal Specialist

Colorado Secretary of State's Office

(303) 894-2200

paris.nelson@sos.state.co.us

 

Please note:  The information contained in this e-mail and any attachments hereto is meant to provide only limited guidance regarding the interpretation of Colorado campaign finance laws and regulations. Nothing in this message shall be considered legal advice. The Colorado Secretary of State's office cannot provide legal advice. If you need legal counsel, please consult an attorney.