Subject: [EL] Question(s) for the listserve |
From: Paris Nelson |
Date: 11/15/2010, 7:32 AM |
To: "election-law@mailman.lls.edu" <election-law@mailman.lls.edu> |
Rick,
Would you be so kind as to send the following two questions
out to the listserve? I would appreciate it!
Thanks. -Paris
Two (unrelated) questions:
1.
Is anyone aware of a good definition of “major
purpose” as applied to political committees, in either in law or simply
proposed? Language used in other contexts (in election law or otherwise) is
helpful, as well.
2.
As many of you are probably aware, the Tenth Circuit
issued a ruling last week rendering our definition of “issue committee”
unconstitutional as a violation of the freedom of association, but the Court did
not provide much guidance to us as to where the line is for “small”
groups that are not subject to the law. Do other states have standards for what
constitutes a “small” issues committee that is exempt from
disclosure laws? Any ideas as to what a federal court might consider tolerable?
Our threshold (struck down) is currently $200 raised or spent supporting or
opposing an issue, and that is clearly too low.
Any guidance would be much appreciated. You may email me
directly at paris.nelson@sos.state.co.us,
or reply to the list. Thanks in advance!
Paris
Paris Nelson
Elections Division - Campaign
Finance Legal Specialist
Colorado Secretary of State's
Office
(303) 894-2200
paris.nelson@sos.state.co.us
Please note: The
information contained in this e-mail and any attachments hereto is meant to
provide only limited guidance regarding the interpretation of Colorado campaign
finance laws and regulations. Nothing in this message shall be considered legal
advice. The Colorado Secretary of State's office cannot provide legal advice.
If you need legal counsel, please consult an attorney.