Subject: Re: [EL] The Millionaire's Amendment
From: Jon Roland
Date: 11/19/2010, 8:25 AM
To: "election-law@mailman.lls.edu" <election-law@mailman.lls.edu>
Reply-to:
"jon.roland@constitution.org"

The best record of success in this field is that of the marketing consultants with their potential clients, to persuade them that enough marketing of the kind money can buy can guarantee a victory. It cannot, because there is a limit to the effectiveness of that kind of marketing. Ultimately, the dominant processes are interpersonal influences and the perceived fit of the candidate to the concerns of the voters, a perception that is not amenable to unlimited molding. See Diffusion of Innovations.

On 11/19/2010 09:56 AM, Craig Holman wrote:
Yes, the political science research is rich with studies documenting that self-funded candidates generally fare poorly at the polls. But this lesson has not been learned by candidates or lawmakers. Many wealthy individuals really believe they can simply buy an office -- and their opponents tend to believe likewise, resulting in an arm's race in fundraising and spending.


-- Jon

----------------------------------------------------------
Constitution Society               http://constitution.org
2900 W Anderson Ln C-200-322              Austin, TX 78757
512/299-5001                   jon.roland@constitution.org
----------------------------------------------------------