Subject: [EL] Electionlawblog news and commentary 11/23/10 |
From: Rick Hasen |
Date: 11/23/2010, 8:50 AM |
To: Election Law |
See here.
Jay Weiner blogs
about yesterday's Minnesota hearing.
The NY Times offers this
report.
The Washington Post offers this
report.
Time to download the 2010 edition of A
Guide to Election Year Activities of Section 501(c)(3)
Organizations.
Wow.
This
editorial begins: "The Supreme Court ruling in the
Citizens United case ranks with the woeful economy, the Tea
Party and other forces that brought about tumultuous change in
the recent elections. The case may prove more significant in the
evolution of the court's role in American law. "
The Colorado Independent offers this
report.
The NY Times offers this
report.
The Star-Tribune reports
on Emmer-Dayton.
You can read the complaint this
this link. It raises only state law issues, and reserves
the right to bring the federal issues back to federal court.
Notably, the complaint fails to allege anything about the vote
counts, which it seems to me could moot Miller's claim (because
even if none of the ballots Miller objected to were counted,
Murkowski still should have more votes than Miller). This
article in the Anchorage Daily News explains that
the federal law barring certification now kicks in for the
duration of the state suit, and could result in there being a
period where Alaska would be represented by only a single
senator.
The Village Voice offers this
report.
Rob Richie blogs.
BNA offers this
report.
The
latest from Minnesota.
You can now read my
response to Bruce Cain's recent post
in the Cato Unbound series
this month on campaign finance disclosure.
-- Rick Hasen William H. Hannon Distinguished Professor of Law Loyola Law School 919 Albany Street Los Angeles, CA 90015-1211 (213)736-1466 (213)380-3769 - fax rick.hasen@lls.edu http://www.lls.edu/academics/faculty/hasen.html http://electionlawblog.org