Subject: Re: [EL] Electionlawblog news and commentary 11/29/10 |
From: "Goldfeder, Jerry H." <jgoldfeder@stroock.com> |
Date: 11/29/2010, 9:37 AM |
To: 'Rick Hasen' <Rick.Hasen@lls.edu>, EDWARD FOLEY <foley.33@osu.edu> |
CC: Election Law <election-law@mailman.lls.edu> |
I remember it the same way. Please confirm!
Jerry H. Goldfeder
Special Counsel
Stroock & Stroock & Lavan LLP
180 Maiden Lane
New York, NY 10038
212-806-5857 (office)
917-680-3132 (cell)
212-806-7857 (fax)
www.stroock.com/goldfeder
From: election-law-bounces@mailman.lls.edu
[mailto:election-law-bounces@mailman.lls.edu] On Behalf Of Rick Hasen
Sent: Monday, November 29, 2010 12:28 PM
To: EDWARD FOLEY
Cc: Election Law
Subject: Re: [EL] Electionlawblog news and commentary 11/29/10
Not only is Toobin wrong on that; he also states "(Recounts of the ballots by media organizations produced ambiguous results; they suggest that Gore would have won a full statewide recount and Bush would have won
the limited recount initially sought by the Gore forces.)"
The phrase "full statewide recount" referred to a recount of both overvotes and undervotes, something Gore did not ask for and the court did not order.
On 11/29/2010 9:21 AM, EDWARD FOLEY wrote:
One quick factual question about the Toobin piece that Rick links to. Toobin says that the "the Florida courts, interpreting Florida election law, [ordered] a statewide recount of all undervotes and overvotes;
that is, ballots that indicated no Presidential preference or more than one." My memory is different: the Florida Supreme Court's 4-3 decision ordered only a statewide recount of undervotes, not overvotes, and that was a basis of concern in both Justice Wells'
dissent at the state level, as well as mentioned as a potential factor in the U.S. Supreme Court's Equal Protection analysis.
I'm not currently in a position to go back and either confirm or refute my memory on this. I'm wondering if any list members is in a position to easily and quickly do so.
Thanks very much, Ned
----- Original Message -----
From: Rick Hasen <Rick.Hasen@lls.edu>
Date: Monday, November 29, 2010 12:00 pm
Subject: [EL] Electionlawblog news and commentary 11/29/10
To: Election Law <election-law@mailman.lls.edu>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> > _______________________________________________
> election-law mailing list
> election-law@mailman.lls.edu
> http://mailman.lls.edu/mailman/listinfo/election-law
>
>
> --
> BEGIN-ANTISPAM-VOTING-LINKS
> ------------------------------------------------------
>
> Teach CanIt if this mail (ID 1120492727) is spam:
> Spam:
> https://antispam.osu.edu/b.php?i=1120492727&m=fa5737abc67f&c=sNot spam:
https://antispam.osu.edu/b.php?i=1120492727&m=fa5737abc67f&c=n
> Forget vote:
> https://antispam.osu.edu/b.php?i=1120492727&m=fa5737abc67f&c=f---
> ---------------------------------------------------
> END-ANTISPAM-VOTING-LINKS
>
--
Rick Hasen
William H. Hannon Distinguished Professor of Law
Loyola Law School
919 Albany Street
Los Angeles, CA 90015-1211
(213)736-1466
(213)380-3769 - fax
rick.hasen@lls.edu
http://www.lls.edu/academics/faculty/hasen.html
http://electionlawblog.org