Subject: Re: [EL] Different limits on contributions (state law)
From: Craig Holman
Date: 12/15/2010, 10:43 AM
To: "still@votelaw.com" <still@votelaw.com>, "election-law@mailman.lls.edu" <election-law@mailman.lls.edu>

Hello Ed:

There are quite a few special restrictions on campaign contributions from specific sectors that have shown a history or tendency toward corruption, which have been upheld by the courts. Perhaps most notably, eight states (as well as the SEC) restrict or ban contributions from government contractors to those responsible for awarding the contracts. The most recent state to join the league of cleaning up the government contracting process was Illinois, following Gov. Blagojevich's tendency to dole out contracts to campaign contributors.

In addition, as you note, five states restrict or ban campaign contributions from registered lobbyists, including California. The California Supreme Court, for example, recognized that the state did have a compelling interest in “ridding the political system of both apparent and actual corruption and improper influence” in banning all contributions from lobbyists, but the court invalidated the statute as overly broad. 25 Cal. 3d 33 (1979). The court noted that while “either apparent or actual corruption might warrant some restriction of lobbyist associational freedom, it does not warrant total prohibition of all contributions by all lobbyists to all candidates.” In response, California implemented a somewhat more narrowly drawn statute, prohibiting lobbyists from making campaign contributions to those whom they lobby. Cal. Govt Code §85702.
 
Eight states have restricted or banned campaign contributions from gaming interests because of a prevalence of corruption or the appearance of corruption, which have also been upheld by the courts. Casino Association of Louisiana Inc. v. Louisiana, 537 U.S. 1226, cert. denied by the U.S. Supreme Court; and Petition by Soto, 236 N.J.Super. 303, 565 A.2d 1088, cert. also denied by the U.S. Supreme Court.  
 
Similarly, four states restrict campaign contributions from insurance agents to elected insurance commissioners. And a few states even ban campaign contributions from public utilities to state elected officials.


Craig Holman, Ph.D.
Government Affairs Lobbyist
Public Citizen
215 Pennsylvania Avenue NE
Washington, D.C. 20003
TEL: (202) 454-5182
CEL: (202) 905-7413
FAX: (202) 547-7392


-----Original Message-----
From: Edward Still <still@votelaw.com>
To: Election Law <election-law@mailman.lls.edu>
Sent: Wed, Dec 15, 2010 11:35 am
Subject: [EL] Different limits on contributions (state law)

The NCSL 2005 chart "Limits on contributions to PACs" and the 2010 chart "State Limits on Contributions to Candidates" say that lobbyists in Massachusetts are restricted to $200 while others can contribute $500.  Has this provision been challenged? 

Are there any other classes of individuals who are restricted or prohibited from making contributions to state PACs or state candidates (that is, restricted when compared to the general contribution limits imposed by state law)?

Edward Still
attorney, mediator, arbitrator
2112 11th Ave S., Suite 541
Birmingham AL 35205
205-320-2882
fax 205-449-9752
  www.votelaw.com/blog
  www.edwardstill.com
  www.linkedin.com/in/edwardstill
_______________________________________________
election-law mailing list
election-law@mailman.lls.edu
http://mailman.lls.edu/mailman/listinfo/election-law