Subject: Re: [EL] 12 Months After: The Effect of Citizens United
From: Jon Roland
Date: 1/20/2011, 8:02 AM
To: "election-law@mailman.lls.edu" <election-law@mailman.lls.edu>
Reply-to:
"jon.roland@constitution.org"

The confusion on this issue among seemingly educated persons is amazing.

The language of the First Amendment is very clear. It is a restriction on the power of Congress to restrict certain kinds of activities, specifically, the production and dissemination of communications. The restriction was not further restricted to the kinds of entities that might engage in those activities, such as individuals or citizens. As stated, it applies to the production or dissemination of communications by anyone or anything, even genetically enhanced animals, androids, or space aliens.

Corporations are just collections of individuals, who do not lose any rights in associating with others. They are not (yet) composed of collections of animals, machines, or space aliens, but when they are, the same restriction on Congress will apply. "No law" means no law.

If a corporate charter does not authorize donating to election campaigns, then that is a matter for enforcement by its membership or by the designated agency of the chartering state, not of Congress.

Undue influence by concentrations of wealth? Wealthy individuals can exercise such influence as well. There is nothing about corporations as such that makes them more suspect than individuals might be.

If you don't want concentrations of wealth to unduly influence elections, then don't use elections to select officials. Use sortition, which is the only method ever discovered to do that, unless we turn over governance to machines, in which case I want to be the one who programs them.

Strictly speaking, the Emerson and succeeding cases that extended the First Amendment to the states via the 14th, were not correct. The First only restricts Congress. However, the Ninth is not limited to Congress, and includes the kinds of public action listed in the First. The SC should have cited the Ninth, not the First, for a cleaner opinion.


-- Jon

----------------------------------------------------------
Constitution Society               http://constitution.org
2900 W Anderson Ln C-200-322              Austin, TX 78757
512/299-5001                   jon.roland@constitution.org
----------------------------------------------------------