There is a humorous element to this that merits note: Barack Obama defeated a guy who lived in Maryland (Alan Keyes) for his Illinois US Senate seat in 2004. Rahm E. maintains his residency and franchise, but he is disqualified as a resident of Chicago to run for mayor.
We all know and understand the details of US Senate versus state / local office qualification, but it is still danged funny.
Ronald Keith Gaddie
Professor of Political Science
Editor, Social Science Quarterly
The University of Oklahoma
455 West Lindsey Street, Room 222
Norman, OK 73019-2001
Phone 405-325-4989
Fax 405-325-0718
E-mail: rkgaddie@ou.edu
http://faculty-staff.ou.edu/G/Ronald.K.Gaddie-1
http://socialsciencequarterly.org
________________________________________
From: election-law-bounces@mailman.lls.edu [election-law-bounces@mailman.lls.edu] on behalf of Trevor Potter [tpotter@capdale.com]
Sent: Monday, January 24, 2011 8:35 PM
To: rick.hasen@lls.edu; Election Law
Subject: Re: [EL] more news 1/24/11
I agree with everything Rick says about Rahm E.. However, it seems to me Rick is arguing that there should not be residence statutes for candidates --that voters should decide whether someone has sufficient connection with a locality or district or state. But Illinois has made a different policy decision and created such a requirement-so we can't say "let the voters decide". If the statute doesn't let them . (I have no view on the statute as I have not read the case law noted on the list serve).
Trevor potter
Sent by Good Messaging (www.good.com)
-----Original Message-----
From: Rick Hasen [mailto:hasenr@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, January 24, 2011 06:38 PM Eastern Standard Time
To: Election Law
Subject: [EL] more news 1/24/11
January 24, 2011
"Let Rahm Run! The Illinois Courts Should Let the Voters Decide Whether He'll Be Chicago's Next Mayor"
I have written this piece <http://www.slate.com/id/2282287/> for Slate. A snippet:
Today's decision is wrong on many levels. Whether Emanuel's move to D.C. for a year should affect his mayoral chances is a question for the voters, not the courts, to decide. Emanuel's residency is no secret--it has been a defining campaign issue. If Chicago voters don't want to vote for Emanuel because they think he's a carpetbagger (even though this strains credulity given his longstanding Chicago ties), they can reject him at the ballot box. Now, in a nonpartisan election, they'll have to choose among a long list of candidates, none of whom has polled as strongly as Emanuel. Finally, should a politician really face a penalty like this for serving the president? Is it really true that no good deed goes unpunished?
Posted by Rick Hasen at 03:28 PM <http://electionlawblog.org/archives/018597.html>
"House Lawyers Want Face Time With 9th Circuit"
Interesting oral argument coming up <http://legaltimes.typepad.com/blt/2011/01/house-lawyers-want-face-time-with-9th-circuit.html> in Speech or Debate Clause case involving former Rep. Rick Renzi.
Posted by Rick Hasen at 01:46 PM <http://electionlawblog.org/archives/018596.html>
"The GOP's Campaign Finance 'Sneak Attack'"
Mother Jones offers this report <http://motherjones.com/politics/2011/01/republican-public-financing-cantor-corporation#> .
Posted by Rick Hasen at 01:43 PM <http://electionlawblog.org/archives/018595.html>
"Build a Bigger House"
Dalton Conley and Jacqueline Stevens have written this NY Times oped <http://www.nytimes.com/2011/01/24/opinion/24conley.html> .
Posted by Rick Hasen at 01:40 PM <http://electionlawblog.org/archives/018594.html>
"Independent Spending? Who Are We Kidding?"
Meredith McGehee blogs <http://www.clcblog.org/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=411:independent-spending-who-are-we-kidding-1-24-11> .
Posted by Rick Hasen at 01:35 PM <http://electionlawblog.org/archives/018593.html>
"Key questions surrounding the Rahm Emanuel residency case"
The Chicago Sun-Times offers this report <http://www.suntimes.com/news/cityhall/2835963-418/emanuel-state-election-run-code.html> . More from the Washington Post <http://voices.washingtonpost.com/thefix/white-house/rahm-emanuel-ruled-ineligible.html> .
My initial thoughts about the ruling will appear soon at Slate <http://www.slate.com/> .
Posted by Rick Hasen at 01:30 PM <http://electionlawblog.org/archives/018592.html>
--
Rick Hasen
Visiting Professor
UC Irvine School of Law
rhasen@law.uci.edu
William H. Hannon Distinguished Professor of Law
Loyola Law School
919 Albany Street
Los Angeles, CA 90015-1211
(213)736-1466
(213)380-3769 - fax
rick.hasen@lls.edu
http://www.lls.edu/academics/faculty/hasen.html
http://electionlawblog.org
<- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ->
To ensure compliance with requirements imposed by the IRS,
we inform you that, unless specifically indicated otherwise,
any tax advice contained in this communication (including any
attachments) was not intended or written to be used, and
cannot be used, for the purpose of (i) avoiding tax-related
penalties under the Internal Revenue Code, or (ii) promoting,
marketing, or recommending to another party any tax-related
matter addressed herein.
This message is for the use of the intended recipient only. It is
from a law firm and may contain information that is privileged and
confidential. If you are not the intended recipient any disclosure,
copying, future distribution, or use of this communication is
prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please
advise us by return e-mail, or if you have received this communication
by fax advise us by telephone and delete/destroy the document.
_______________________________________________
election-law mailing list
election-law@mailman.lls.edu
http://mailman.lls.edu/mailman/listinfo/election-law
_______________________________________________
election-law mailing list
election-law@mailman.lls.edu
http://mailman.lls.edu/mailman/listinfo/election-law