Subject: [EL] more news 1/25/11 |
From: Rick Hasen |
Date: 1/25/2011, 4:42 PM |
To: Election Law |
Reply-to: "rick.hasen@lls.edu" |
Political Wire reports on Senator Reid's defense of earmarks in the face of an expected earmark ban call by President Obama in the State of the Union speech. What president wouldn't be for an earmark ban, which shifts power from the legislative to the executive branch?
Chicago
Tribune: The Illinois Supreme Court will take Rahm's
appeal, and will decide it on the existing briefing, without
oral argument. What to make of that? First, the Court sees the
need to act very quickly, given the imminent election. Second, I
don't think they would have taken this step if there wasn't a
fairly good chance of a reversal, thereby allowing Emanuel to
run.
Here.
This does not
surprise me.