Subject: Re: [EL] Public Finance Vote in House, more news
From: Trevor Potter
Date: 1/26/2011, 1:50 PM
To: "Smith, Brad" <BSmith@law.capital.edu>, Election Law <election-law@mailman.lls.edu>

Surely Richard Nixon did NOT sign ‘the Revenue Act of 1991”…

 

From: election-law-bounces@mailman.lls.edu [mailto:election-law-bounces@mailman.lls.edu] On Behalf Of Smith, Brad
Sent: Wednesday, January 26, 2011 4:43 PM
To: Election Law
Subject: Re: [EL] Public Finance Vote in House, more news

 

Rick writes:

Today the House voted. See this post-vote statement from CLC and this pre-vote statement from CCP.
What happens next? Nothing. The bill will not get a vote in the Senate.

- I expect Rick will be wrong on that.

On a related note, Meredith McGeehee's CLC post linked above claims that the Republicans who today voted to end the system represented "the party of Nixon, not of Abraham Lincoln."  Lincoln was elected in the days when there were no campaign finance laws, and Lincoln himself was even known to campaign anonymously.  Nixon, on the other hand, was the President who signed the Revenue Act of 1991, which created the presidential public funding system that the House voted to repeal today. 

 

Bradley A. Smith

Josiah H. Blackmore II/Shirley M. Nault Designated Professor of Law

Capital University Law School

303 E. Broad St.

Columbus, OH 43215

(614) 236-6317

http://www.law.capital.edu/Faculty/Bios/bsmith.asp

 


From: election-law-bounces@mailman.lls.edu on behalf of Rick Hasen
Sent: Wed 1/26/2011 3:51 PM
To: Election Law
Subject: [EL] Public Finance Vote in House, more news

January 26, 2011

"Redistricting Reform Bills Target Systemic Abuse, Deserve Hearings"

See this CLC press release.

Posted by Rick Hasen at 12:47 PM

Different Views of Today's House Vote to End the Public Financing Program for Presidential Elections

Today the House voted. See this post-vote statement from CLC and this pre-vote statement from CCP.

What happens next? Nothing. The bill will not get a vote in the Senate or the President's signature. Nor will a bill aimed at fixing the broken system be passed. No serious candidate for President will accept public financing in 2012.

Posted by Rick Hasen at 12:44 PM

"The legal distinction between domicile and resident may be critical to running for public office in Illinois"

See this post at the New York Public Personnel blog.

Posted by Rick Hasen at 12:35 PM

"Democracy, Inc? Citizens United, Corporate Expenditures & the Future of Campaign Finance Law"

A great lineup at this USF symposium on Feb. 25 in San Francisco, including a keynote by Jim Bopp. I had wanted to speak at this event but had a conflict---I hope there's a webcast!

Posted by Rick Hasen at 10:15 AM

--
Rick Hasen
Visiting Professor
UC Irvine School of Law
rhasen@law.uci.edu

William H. Hannon Distinguished Professor of Law
Loyola Law School
919 Albany Street
Los Angeles, CA 90015-1211
(213)736-1466
(213)380-3769 - fax
rick.hasen@lls.edu
http://www.lls.edu/academics/faculty/hasen.html
http://electionlawblog.org

<- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ->
To ensure compliance with requirements imposed by the IRS, 
we inform you that, unless specifically indicated otherwise, 
any tax advice contained in this communication (including any 
attachments) was not intended or written to be used, and 
cannot be used, for the purpose of (i) avoiding tax-related 
penalties under the Internal Revenue Code, or (ii)  promoting, 
marketing, or recommending to another party any tax-related 
matter addressed herein. 
 
This message is for the use of the intended recipient only.  It is
from a law firm and may contain information that is privileged and
confidential.  If you are not the intended recipient any disclosure,
copying, future distribution, or use of this communication is
prohibited.  If you have received this communication in error, please
advise us by return e-mail, or if you have received this communication
by fax advise us by telephone and delete/destroy the document.