In Oregon, trial court judges are elected on a county-by-county
basis. Many Oregon statutes assign special duties for reviewing
legislation and/or certain state agency actions to the trial court
for the county (Marion) where the capitol (Salem) is located.
Marion County is home to fewer than 10% of Oregon residents. Thus,
trial court judges elected by less than 10% of the Oregon electorate
are assigned by state law to take statewide actions that no other
trial court judges can take.
Is there a legally cognizable problem here?
Dan Meek
10949 S.W. 4th Ave
Portland, OR 97219
503-293-9021 phone
866-926-9646 fax
dan@meek.net
|
On 1/31/2011 6:31 PM, john.k.tanner@gmail.com wrote:
No. Judges are not representatives in that sense. I believe that the tendency is to adjust districts based on caseload,
Sent from my Verizon Wireless BlackBerry
-----Original Message-----
From: "Gaddie, Ronald K." <rkgaddie@ou.edu>
Sender: election-law-bounces@mailman.lls.edu
Date: Tue, 1 Feb 2011 02:21:00
To: rick.hasen@lls.edu<rick.hasen@lls.edu>; Election Law<election-law@mailman.lls.edu>
Subject: [EL] Query about retention elections
_______________________________________________
election-law mailing list
election-law@mailman.lls.edu
http://mailman.lls.edu/mailman/listinfo/election-law
_______________________________________________
election-law mailing list
election-law@mailman.lls.edu
http://mailman.lls.edu/mailman/listinfo/election-law