Subject: Re: [EL] another Bush v. Gore |
From: Rick Hasen |
Date: 2/1/2011, 2:12 PM |
To: "richardwinger@yahoo.com" <richardwinger@yahoo.com> |
CC: Election Law <election-law@mailman.lls.edu> |
Reply-to: "rick.hasen@lls.edu" |
So which justice mentioned it?
--- On Tue, 2/1/11, Rick Hasen <hasenr@gmail.com> wrote:
From: Rick Hasen <hasenr@gmail.com>
Subject: [EL] another Bush v. Gore
To: "Election Law" <election-law@mailman.lls.edu>
Date: Tuesday, February 1, 2011, 1:42 PM
A few months ago, I sent out a query asking anyone if they could
identify a case decided in the last 30 years (but not in the last five
years) aside from Bush v. Gore which the Supreme Court had not yet cited
for any proposition, in any majority, plurality, concurring, or
dissenting opinion.
I found one today, Ohler v. U.S., 529 U.S. 753 (2000), a criminal law case.
--
Rick Hasen
Visiting Professor
UC Irvine School of Law
rhasen@law.uci.edu
William H. Hannon Distinguished Professor of Law
Loyola Law School
919 Albany Street
Los Angeles, CA 90015-1211
(213)736-1466
(213)380-3769 - fax
rick.hasen@lls.edu
http://www.lls.edu/academics/faculty/hasen.html
http://electionlawblog.org
_______________________________________________
election-law mailing list
election-law@mailman.lls.edu
http://mailman.lls.edu/mailman/listinfo/election-law