Will the Supreme Court Agree on Tuesday to Hear
Judicial Speech Case?
SCOTUSBlog reports
that Bauer
v. Shepard is on the conference list for today. If cert.
is granted, we'll likely get an announcement Tuesday. I
discussed the case here,
and a related case here.
Given the prominence of Judge Easterbrook, the importance of the
issue, and the likelihood that conservative Justices on the
Supreme Court will be interested in the First Amendment issues
in this case, I think it is likely (though not certain) that the
Court will take this case.
Posted by Rick Hasen at
08:04
AM
Read the Supplemental Briefs Ordered in the
Shelby County Case
They are linked and analyzed here
at RedistrictingOnline.org.
Posted by Rick Hasen at
07:53
AM
"Cuomo Redistricting Bill Limits Lawmakers'
Role"
The NY Times offers this
report.
Posted by Rick Hasen at
07:49
AM
"Secretary of state won't face charges in
incident at courthouse"
The Indianapolis Star reports.
Posted by Rick Hasen at
07:45
AM
"Liberal civil servants treat political
opponents as enemies"
Hans von Spakovsky has written this
oped for the Washington Examiner.
Posted by Rick Hasen at
07:42
AM
"How to slay a gerrymander; The nation's
governors could combat reckless redistricting."
Michael Waldman has written this
oped for the Philadelphia Inquirer.
Posted by Rick Hasen at
02:22
PM
"Federal watchdog: punish former U.S. attorney
for fundraiser"
Josh Gerstein blogs
at Politico.
Posted by Rick Hasen at
12:04
PM
Cain Reply to Quinn
Bruce Cain emails:
Your remarks do not bode well for the Commission's prospects.
Apparently if you are not a registered Republican, you are by
definition a Democrat even if you have been a decline to state
your whole voting career. And apparently, if you do a
nonpartisan redistricting for a liberal city, by definition you
are a liberal activist who has it in for the Republicans. And
apparently, even if for 20 years you have worked cooperatively
with all members of the public, reaching out to Republicans,
your hands are soiled with partisan dirt. This logic will
clearly be applied to the Commission's decline to state members
and to any decisions they make as well. We have tried for the
last 20 years not to argue about the numbers and technical
services, but this may not last.
At this point, I'm going to ask the participants to take the
matter out to the alley---or at least to a different venue, as
interesting as this exchange has been.
Posted by Rick Hasen at
12:00
PM