Subject: [EL] Federal court upholds Wisconsin judicial public financing law/more news
From: Rick Hasen
Date: 3/31/2011, 2:25 PM
To: Election Law
Reply-to:
"rhasen@law.uci.edu"

Federal District Court Upholds McComish-Like Matching Funds Requirement in Wisconsin Supreme Court Elections

You can read the district court's opinion granting summary judgment at this link.

It is a thoughtful discussion, and considers the possibility that the trigger funds might be constitutional in judicial elections even if the Supreme Court strikes down their use in legislative elections in McComish.

Also especially interesting is must-read footnote 3, which considers whether the explosion of campaign financing in Wisconsin Supreme Court races has been a partial cause of the marked decline of collegiality on that court. Very bold words for one judge to put in a judicial opinion calling attention to the problems of collegiality on another court.

Posted by Rick Hasen at 02:23 PM

"Iowa redistricting proposal matches two pairs of incumbents against each other"

"The Fix" reports.

Posted by Rick Hasen at 02:13 PM

"Bush v. Gore: The Worst (or at Least Second-to-the-Worst) Supreme Court Decision Ever "

Mark Brodin has posted this draft on SSRN.

Posted by Rick Hasen at 10:04 AM

"Important New SEC Ruling Offers Diversified Shareholder Responses To Corporate Election Spending"

This item appears at Corporate Disclosure Alert.

MORE from Ciara Torres-Spelliscy.

Posted by Rick Hasen at 09:47 AM
--
Rick Hasen
Visiting Professor
UC Irvine School of Law
401 E. Peltason Dr., Suite 1000
Irvine, CA 92697-8000
949.824.3072 - office
949.824.0495 - fax
rhasen@law.uci.edu

William H. Hannon Distinguished Professor of Law
Loyola Law School
http://www.lls.edu/academics/faculty/hasen.html
http://electionlawblog.org